dave@nic.com
This document covers the major security issues that affect Linux security. General philosophy and net born resources are also discussed.
A number of other HOWTO documents overlap with security issues, and those have been pointed to wherever appropriate.
This document is not meant to be a up to date exploits document. Large numbers of new exploits happen all the time. This document will point you where to look for such up to date information, and some general methods to prevent such exploits from taking place.
Additionally, while there are several resources available in various places on the Internet regarding general security, we are trying to consolidate much of this general information, and provide information a general system administrator can use as a practical guide. This should in no means substitute for reading books on the appropriate subject, and practical experience which works for you.
The US Government has several organizations devoted to computer security, and generally the information they have online is quite extensive, and very useful. A general introduction to computer security is available at http://csrc.ncsl.nist.gov/nistpubs/800-12/ which will be very useful.
See the References section for pointers to security references. It is also a tremendous advantage if you understand how TCP/IP works, and some of the common system administration functions. You might find this guide helpful in a beginner introduction http://www.sunworld.com/sunworldonline/swol-11-1995/swol-11-sysadmin.html While it is Solaris-centric, you'll find much of this information general enough to still be applicable.
You may also find this link helpful http://www.cis.ohio-state.edu/~dolske/gradwork/cis694q/ for another introduction to TCP, including how sequence numbers work, which is the foundation of ``man in the middle'' attacks, a description of the SYN/ACK handshake used to initiate a TCP connection, a description of a few of the problems in TCP/IP, a few other types of attacks, and how they work, as well as some solutions to these problems.
New versions of this document will be periodically posted to comp.os.linux.answers. They will also be added to the various anonymous FTP sites who archive such information, including:
ftp://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/Linux/docs/HOWTO
In addition, you should generally be able to find this document on the Linux Documentation Project Web home page via:
Finally, the very latest version of this document should also be available in various formats from either of the following:
http://nic.com/~dave/Security/
All comments, error reports, additional information and criticism of all sorts should be directed to:
No liability for the contents of this documents can be accepted. Use the concepts, examples and other content at your own risk. Additionally, this is an early version, with many possibilities for inaccuracies and errors. It is provided "as is" without express or implied warranty.
Many of the examples and descriptions in this document refer specifically to the Red Hat distribution. We are very interested in incorporating other distributions as well. If you have ideas on how other distributions perform the same measures as are listed here, we would be interested in hearing from you.
This document is copyrighted (c)1998 Dave Wreski, and distributed under the following terms:
This document will discuss procedures and commonly used software to increase the trust level of your system. It is important to discuss the basic concepts first, and create a security foundation before we get started.
This document has been dividedinto a number of sections. They cover several broad kinds of security issues. So far these sections include:
/var/log/messages and keep an eye on your system, and
Perhaps the area of most concentration on security is done with host-based security. This typically involves making sure your own system is secure, and hoping everyone else on your network does the same.
Choosing good passwords, securing your services your hosts offer, keeping good accounting records, and upgrading programs that have known security exploits are among the things the local Security Administrator is responsible for doing.
Although this is absolutely necessary, it can become a daunting task once your network of machines becomes larger. It can be said that host-based security does not scale. A host-based security exploit must be repaired on each machine on your network, which requires accessing each machine individually and applying the fix.
Network security is as necessary as local host security. With your single system, or a distributed computing network, the Internet, or hundreds, if not thousands or more computers on the same network, you can't rely on each one of those systems being secure. Making sure authorized users are the only ones permitted to use your network resources, building firewalls, using strong encryption, and ensuring there are no rogue, or unsecured, machines on your network are all part of the network security administrator's duties.
This document will discuss some of the techniques used to secure your site, and hopefully show you some of the ways to prevent an intruder from gaining access to what you are trying to protect.
One type of security that must be discussed is ``security through obscurity''. This means that by doing something like changing the login name from 'root' to 'toor', for example, to try and obscure someone from breaking into your system as root may be thought of as a false sense of security, and can result in very unpleasant and unexpected consequences.
However, it can also be used to your benefit if done properly. If you
tell all the users who are authorized to use the root account on your
machines to use the root equivilent instead, entries in the
/var/log/secure for the real root user would surely indicate
an attempted break-in, giving you some advance notice. You'll have to
decide if this advantage outweighs the additional administration
overhead.
In most cases, though, any system attacker will quickly see through such empty security measures. Simply because you may have a small site, or relatively low profile does not mean an intruder won't be interested in what you have. We'll discuss what your protecting in the next sections.
In the ever-changing world of global data communications, inexpensive Internet connections, and fast-paced software development, security is becoming more and more of an issue. Security is now a basic requirement because global computing is inherently insecure. As your data goes from point A to point B on the Internet, for example, it may pass through several other points along the way, giving other users the opportunity to intercept, and even alter, your data. Even other users on your system may maliciously transform your data into something you did not intend. Unauthorized access to your system may be obtained by intruders, also known as ``crackers'', who then use advanced knowledge to impersonate you, steal information from you, or even deny you access to your own resources. If you're still wondering what the difference is between a ``Hacker'' and a ``Cracker'', see Eric Raymond's document, ``How to Become A Hacker'', available at http://sagan.earthspace.net/~esr/faqs/hacker-howto.html.
While it is difficult to determine just how vulnerable a particular system is, there are several indications we can use:
First, keep in mind that no computer system can ever be ``completely secure''. All you can do is make it increasingly difficult for someone to compromise your system. For the average home Linux user, not much is required to keep the casual cracker at bay. For high profile Linux users (banks, telecommunications companies, etc), much more work is required.
Another factor to take into account is that the more secure your system is the more intrusive your security becomes. You need to decide where in this balancing act your system is still usable and yet secure for your purposes. For instance, you could require everyone dialing into your system to use a call back modem to call them back at their home number. This is more secure, but if someone is not at home, it makes it difficult for them to login. You could also setup your Linux system with no network or connection to the Internet, but this makes it harder to surf the web.
If you have more than one person logging on to your machine, or machines, you should establish a ``Security Policy'' stating how much security is required by your site and what auditing is in place to check it. You can find a well-known security policy example at http://ds.internic.net/rfc/rfc2196.txt. It has been recently updated, and contains a great framework for establishing a security policy for your company.
It is even advisable to generate a security policy for systems with just two users, or even a desktop machine, used for normal Internet dialup access.
While developing your security policy, you will have to decide on that balance between security and ease-of-use. You will also need to determine the current level of security on your systems. Ask yourself questions such as these:
Improving security at your site will have to be a progressive process -- you can not secure your systems overnight, and most likely your users will be reluctant to change, because they feel they will be losing usability. Also, don't discount the possibility that there are several packages and binaries on your system that are not even used, and can be removed without affecting functionality, yet improving security by limiting the available exploits.
Before you attempt to secure your system, you should determine what level of threat you have to protect against, what risks you should or should not take, and how vulnerable your system is as a result. You should analyze your system to know what you're protecting, why you're protecting it, what value it has, and who has responsibility for your data and other assets.
Additionally, having one insecure account on your system can result in
your entire network being compromised. A single user that is allowed
to login using an rhosts file, or through the use of an
insecure service, increases the ability for the intruder using this to
``get his foot in the door''. Once the intruder has even a normal
user account on your system, or someone else's system, the likelihood
it can be used to gain access to another system, or another account is
quite high.
There are several types of intruders, and it is useful to keep the different characteristics in mind as you are securing your systems.
What's at stake if someone breaks into your system? How much is it worth? When making the evaluation, you should consider items such as computer hardware and software, intellectual property, employee's, resources, such as network bandwidth, disk space, etc.
Of course the concerns of a dynamic PPP home user will be different than those of a company connecting their machine to the Internet, or another large network.
How much time would it take to retrieve/recreate any data that was lost? An initial time investment now can save ten times more time later if you have to recreate data that was lost. Have you checked your backup strategy, and verified your data lately?
Create a simple, generic policy for your system that your users can readily understand and follow. It should protect the data you're safeguarding, as well as the privacy of the users. Some things to consider adding are who has access to the system (Can my friend use my account?), who's allowed to install software on the system, who owns what data, disaster recovery, and appropriate use of the system.
A generally accepted security policy starts with the phrase:
"That which is not expressly permitted is prohibited"
This means that unless you grant access to a service for a user, that user shouldn't be using that service until you do grant access. Make sure the policies work on your regular user account, Saying, ``Ah, I can't figure this permissions problem out, I'll just do it as root'' can lead to security holes that are very obvious, and even ones that haven't been exploited yet.
Additionally, there are several questions you will need to answer to successfully develop a security policy:
You should develop a plan on who to contact when there is a security problem that needs attention.
There are quite a few documents available on developing a Site Security Policy. You can start with this one from Sun Microsystems http://wwwwseast2.usec.sun.com/security/sec.policy.wp.html
This document will discuss various means in which you can secure the assets you have worked hard for: your local machine, data, users, network, even your reputation. What would happen to your reputation if an intruder deleted some of your user's data? Or defaced your web site? Or published your company's corporate project plan for next quarter? If you are planning a network installation, there are many factors you must take into account before adding a single machine to your network.
Even if you have a single dialup PPP account, or just a small site, this does not mean intruders won't be interested in your systems. Large, high profile sites are not the only targets, many intruders simply want to exploit as many sites as possible, regardless of their size. Additionally, they may use a security hole in your site to gain access to other sites you're connected to.
Intruders have a lot of time on their hands, and can avoid guessing how you've obscured your system just by trying all the possibilities. There are also several reasons an intruder may be interested in your systems, which we will discuss later.
See the Host Security and Network Security sections for further information on steps to perform to secure your hosts.
Changes made for supposedly brief periods of time are also a great security risk. Subverting your firewall so you can dial-in from home to your workstation also allows an attacker to do the same. Also, temporary changes easily become permanent, as we quickly forget about such changes.
Remember, the weakest link in the security implementation is likely to be exploited first.
Network security is becoming more and more important as people spend more and more time connected. Compromising network security is often much easier than physical or local, and is much more common.
There are a number of good tools to assist with network security, and more and more of them are shipping with Linux distributions.
Most likely your network will also include Microsoft clients, presumably using either NetBIOS or other inheriently insecure networking protocols.
Among other things, NetBIOS is the protocol Microsoft uses to publicize share names, user names, and host names within the network.
Disabling NetBIOS on any Windows workstations is a prudent idea, as is blocking TCP and UDP ports 137 through 139 on your border routers or firewalls.
A detailed discussion on the actual reasons for this insecurity is available in a paper written by Hobbit, and can be found at his site here http://avian.org:4687/web1/hak/cifs.txt
Unfortunately, disabling NetBIOS also will disable any Remote Access Service it may be offering, as well as browsing (Network Neighborhood). If you must retain your NT server on your network, you may consider two NICs in the machine, one outbound via TCP/IP and one internal only. Disable NetBIOS binding to the TCP/IP side. This keeps enterprising folks from poking into the network via TCP/IP, then using various NET commands to gather network information.
The hacker group called l0pht have written a utility similar to how Crack works on UNIX, called l0phtcrack and is available at their site http://www.l0pht.com as is other generally useful information.
The file security_level.txt, distributed with SAMBA,
discusses the various security levels that can be set using SAMBA,
including encrypted passwords, server security, share-level security,
and user security. It does a good job of explaining the general
security concerns you must deal with.
The security research group called Rhino9, have also put together in depth information on the NetBIOS protocol and interface. You can find it at http://207.98.195.250/texts/netbios.doc
Internet Security Systems also produces a document on Windows file sharing security, and is available here http://www.iss.net/vd/fileshare.html This document, titled File Sharing: Unknown Dangers on Your Network, helps to describe some of the security issues you should be aware of, and just how insecure Windows 95 really is. It is a good overview, whereas Hobbit's document is more of a low-level description at the protocol level.
Special attention should be paid to gateway or firewall systems, as they usually control access to the services running on the entire network. Such gateways should be identified, its function within the network shouild be assessed and owners or administrators should be identified. These hosts, often referred to as ``bastion hosts'' are a prime target for an intruder. They should be some of the most fortified machines on the network.
Be sure to regularly review the current access policies and security of the system itself.
These ``systems'' should absolutely only be running the services necessary to perform it's operation. Your firewall should not be your mail server, web server, contain user accounts, etc. Some of the things you should check for, and absolutely fortify on these hosts include:
It is important to keep aware of the status of your network, so you can not only detect when there is an intrusion, but when there is abnormal system activity, such as system load, increased disk usage, slower network, etc. There are many tools available for network monitoring, most of which were developed on other platforms first, then ported to Linux.
See the COAST archives, available at http://www.cs.purdue.edu/coast/hotlist/ for network monitoring tools.
Matthew Franz mdfranz@txdirect.net has put together a Linux distribution that runs on two or three floppies, and includes many of the tools necessary to probe a network and the services it has available. This sounds like a great method in which to test your current security policy, as well as find otherwise unknown vulnerabilities. You can find the latest version, as well as more information, at http://www.txdirect.net/users/mdfranz/trinux.html
Improperly configured network services and configuration files can lead to a system lacking full control over its services. You can configure your systems to be secure, yet still offer the services necessary. As a general rule:
/etc/hosts.equiv file. A properly
configured system, using TCP Wrappers, offers much better control over
which hosts and users are allowed access to the other machines on your
network.
$HOME/.rhosts files. By properly
configuring PAM, you can eliminate the risk of a user subverting
system security by allowing unauthorized access from a remote system
via a .rhosts file. This should be replaced by the
functionally equivilent SSH file called .shosts. If this is
not possible, Wietse Venema wrote a more secure rsh and rlogin daemon
replacement, available in the logdaemon package. You can find this at
ftp://ftp.win.tue.nl/pub/security/logdaemon-5.6.tar.gz
/etc/exports configuration. Be sure if you
are exporting filesystems using NFS, be sure to configure
/etc/exports with the most restrictive access possible. This
means not using wildcards, not allowing root access, and exporting
read-only wherever possible. Verify who can mount these filesystems
using /usr/sbin/showmount -e localhost.
/etc/securetty file for the list of tty's that root is
permitted to login from. This should only include the local tty's,
and never including pseudo-ttys (from a remote location). The absense
of this file indicates root is permitted to login from anywhere. Use
/bin/su or sudo, available at
ftp://ftp.cs.colorado.edu/pub/sudo/
/etc/inetd.conf and see what
services are being offered by your inetd. Disable any that you do not
need by commenting them out (# at the beginning of the line), and
then sending your inetd process a SIGHUP. All services running from
inetd should be wrapped using TCP Wrappers.
/etc/inetd.conf.
These protocols are extremely insecure and have been the cause of
exploits in the past.
Poor network configurations can also lead to a very difficult intrusion to track. Protecting the ``front door'' with a very well configured firewall will not prevent someone from entering through the ``back door'' via the modem bank with poor authorization.
Before you put your Linux system on ANY network the first thing to look at is what services you need to offer. Services that you do not need to offer should be disabled so that you have one less thing to worry about and attackers have one less place to look for a hole.
You should check your /etc/rc.d/rcN.d, where N is your
systems run level and see if any of the servers started in that
directory are not needed. The files in /etc/rc.d/rcN.d are
actually symbolic links to the directory
/etc/rc.d/init.d. Renaming the files in the init.d
directory has the effect of disabling all the symbolic links in
/etc/rc.d/rcN.d. If you only wish to disable a service for a
particular runlevel, rename the appropriate file with a lower-case
``s'', instead of the upper-case ``S'', such as in S45dhcpd.
If you have BSD style rc files, you will want to check
/etc/rc* for programs you don't need. The Red Hat
distribution includes tksysv, a graphical program to change
what runlevel a particular server runs in. The newer distributions
also include linuxconf, which can also do this.
Additionally, machines on your network running unauthorized services can create an opportunity for a cracker to gain access to the system. Regular port scanning of your machines, as well as running network security scanning tools, can help to find these potential exploits before an intruder does.
Most Linux distributions ship with tcp_wrappers ``wrapping'' all your
TCP services. A tcp_wrapper (known as /usr/sbin/tcpd) is
invoked from /sbin/inetd instead of the real service, such as
telnet or ftp. tcpd then checks the host
that is requesting the service and either executes the real server or
denies access from that host. tcpd allows you to restrict
access to your tcp services. You should make a
/etc/hosts.allow and add in only those hosts that need to
have access to your machines services.
By making simple changes to the inetd configuration file,
/etc/inetd.conf you can monitor and control incoming requests
to network services. Such a modification might look like the
following:
Typical
telnet stream tcp nowait root /usr/sbin/in.telnetd
TCP Wrappers
telnet stream tcp nowait root /usr/sbin/tcp /usr/etc/in.telnetd
In default mode the wrappers report the name of the client host and of
the requested service. Be sure you have syslogd configure
properly to ensure correct logging.
As no information is exchanged between the wrappers and the client or server applications there is no overhead on the actual conversation between the client and server applications occurs.
Additionally, you can configure:
chroot EnvironmentSeveral network services can now be configured to run in a restricted
environment, called a ``chroot jail''. This is an isolated
environment seperated from the ``real'' operating system. Services
such as Apache or bind can be operated in this
environment. A special root directory is created, with a complete
installation of all programs and libraries necessary to execute the
service. The intention is to prevent someone from obtaining root
privilege on the ``real'' operating system, due to a bug in the
service that is operating in the chroot jail.
This should not be treated as a panacea, however. It may help to restrict a process' filesystem access, but it doesn't affect its ability to make privileged system calls (e.g. init_module, modify_ldt, bind to a priviliged port, etc.) So ultimately a root process can break out of a chroot environment; it just makes the necessary shellcode more involved than just ``exec("/bin/sh")''. You can find more information on it's advantages and disadvantages at http://www.ssc.com/lg/issue30/tag_chroot.html This isn't explicitly a chroot discussion, but is helpful, nevertheless.
Keeping up-to-date DNS information about all hosts on your network can help to increase security. In the event of an unauthorized host becomes connected to your network, you can recognize it by its lack of a DNS entry. Many services can be configured to not accept connections from hosts that do not have valid DNS entries.
Descriptive hostnames are just as useful to attackers as they are to internal users. Host names such as ``firewall.mydomain.com'' is obvious to an attacker, as is ``ns.mydomain.com''. These are likely to be prime targets to an attacker. A machine named ``fred.mydomain.com'' likely indicates a normal user's PC, which is also least likely to have an updated security mechanism installed, making it also a prime target.
Keep conscious of possible DNS spoofing. You can find more information on this in the Exploits section of this document.
Further information on securing DNS can be obtained from http://www.psionic.com/papers/dns-linux.html
Cricket Liu and Paul Albitz, the authors of the famed DNS and BIND O'Reilly book, contributed an article on Sun World with hints on how to secure DNS. You can find it, as well as some other excellent general security information at http://www.sunworld.com/swol-11-1997/swol-11-bind.html which discusses information on how to prevent being DNS spoofed.
Additonally, BIND can now successfully be run in a chroot() environment. John A. Martin <jam@jamux.com> has put together a set of Red Hat packages that can be used to install BIND in a chroot jail. You can find more information on this available at ftp://ftp.tux.org/pub/tux/jam/
Be sure to configure a separate user for BIND. This not only restricts the amount of damage an intruder can do after exploiting a security hole in BIND, but also allows administration of the zone files without having to be root. This is generally a good practice, and more packages are configured for doing this more easily than before possible.
NFS is a very widely used file sharing protocol. It allows servers
running nfsd(8) and mountd(8) to ``export'' entire
filesystems to other machines with nfs filesystem support built-in to
their kernels (or some other client support if they are non Linux
machines). mountd(8) keeps track of mounted filesystems in
/etc/mtab, and can display them with showmount(8).
Many sites use NFS to serve home directories to users, so that no matter what machine in the cluster they login to, they will have all their home files.
There is some small amount of ``security'' allowed in exporting filesystems. You can make your nfsd map the remote root user (uid=0) to the nobody user, denying them total access to the files exported. However, since individual users have access to their own (or at least the same uid) files, the remote superuser can login or su to their account and have total access to their files. This is only a small hindrance to an attacker that has access to mount your remote filesystems.
If you must use NFS, make sure you export to only those machines that you really need to export only. Never export your entire root directory, export only directories you need to export and export read-only wherever possible.
Filter TCP port 111, UDP port 111 (portmapper), TCP port 2049, and UDP port 2049 (nfsd) on your firewall or gateway to prevent external access.
The NFS HOWTO also discusses some of the security issues with NFS, and it is available at http://sunsite.unc.edu/LDP/HOWTO/NFS-HOWTO.html for more information on NFS.
Network Information service (formerly YP) is a means of distributing
information to a group of machines. The NIS master holds the
information tables and converts them into NIS map files. These maps
are then served over the network, allowing NIS client machines to get
login, password, home directory and shell information (all the
information in a standard /etc/passwd file), among other
information.
NIS is not at all secure. It was never meant to be. It was meant to be handy and useful. Not only was it not intended to be secure, it also has characteristics which inherently make it insecure. Among these are:
Anyone that can guess the name of your NIS domain (anywhere on the net) can get a copy of your passwd file, and use Crack against your users passwords.
If you must use NIS, make sure you are aware of the dangers.
Control the use of /etc/netgroup file for NIS
systems. Explicitly define which hosts and which users can connect
from a known list of machines.
There is a much more secure replacement for NIS, called NIS+. Check out the NIS HOWTO for more information, available at http://sunsite.unc.edu/LDP/HOWTO/NIS-HOWTO.html
The Washington University FTP server is the default server on Linux distributions. It has the ability to run in a chroot environment, thus (theoretically) protecting the real root environment, limiting the damage an exploit can do.
FTP sites are easily misconfigured, and doing so can lead to a false sense of security, as well as easily exploitable holes. Attackers can use a misconfigured site to transfer pirate software, gain remote access, corrupt downloadable files, cause a denial of service, among other misuses.
Be sure to disable FTP entirely if you don't have any reason to leave it enabled (such as replacing it with ssh) and definately enable quotas on the FTP filesystem. Additionally, disable anonymous FTP access if it is not necessary.
One of the most important services you can provide is a mail server. Unfortunately, it is also one of the most vulnerable to attack, simply due to the number of tasks it must perform and the privileges it typically needs.
If you are using sendmail, it is very important to keep up on current versions. Sendmail has a long long history of security exploits. Always make sure you are running the most recent version. http://www.sendmail.org
An alternative to sendmail is qmail, which alledges to be more secure, and easier to configure. qmail was designed with security in mind from the ground up. It's reported that it's fast, stable and secure. You can find it at http://www.qmail.org
Wietse Venema <wietse@wzv.win.tue.nl> is writing a mail server that is still in testing stages, but also promotes improved security. You can find out more about vmail at http://www.vmailer.org
Significant improvements in preventing unsolicited bulk email (spam) have been made with recent versions of the available SMTP servers. Starting with sendmail-8.9, anti-relaying is enabled by default, which prevents a remote host from using your network and mail servers for forwarding mail to other hosts. Additional filters are also available for preventing spam.
The next thing to take a look at is the security in your system against attacks from local users. Did we just say local users? Yes!
Getting access to a local user is one of the first things that system intruders attempt, while on their way to exploiting the root account. With lax local security, they can then ``upgrade'' their normal user access to root access using a variety of bugs and poorly setup local services. If you make sure your local security is tight, then the intruder will have another hurdle to jump.
Local users can also cause a lot of havoc with your system even (especially) if they really are who they say they are. Providing accounts to people you don't know or have no contact information for is a very bad idea.
If you know you are not going to use some particular package, you can
also delete it entirely. /bin/rpm -e <packagename> under
the Red Hat distribution will erase an entire package. Under debian
/bin/dpkg likely does the same thing.
If you are configuring a new machine to be installed on the network, only initially install the packages that are necessary for its normal operation.
Removing unnecessary setuid and setgid binaries should be a priority. You should always be aware of which ones are available on your system. You can do this using the following:
user@myhost$ find / -type f -perm +6000
This will find all the setuid and setgid binaries on your system. You can find more about the setuid and setgid permissions in the File System Security section.
The default Linux system installation is generally far more secure than other operating systems, due to not having to conform to older standards and traditions.
However, installing any operating system, and connecting it to the network is a foolish idea. Many system defaults are still more lenient than is intended to be used in a production network system.
Spend some time to customize it to your environment. Be sure to follow these guidelines, as well as the ones refered to herein, including disabling any services that are not necessary, configuring auditing, etc, before connecting a machine to the network.
Discussion of backup methods and storage is beyond the scope of this document, but a few words relating to backups and security:
If you have less than 650Mb of data to store on a partition, a CD-R copy of your data is a good way to go (as it's hard to tamper with later, and if stored properly can last a long time). Tapes and other re-writable media should be write protected as soon as your backup is complete and verified to prevent tampering. Make sure you store your backups in a secure off line area. A good backup will ensure that you have a known good point to restore your system from.
A six-tape cycle is an easy one to maintain. This includes four tapes for during the week, one tape for even Friday's, and one tape for odd Friday's. Perform an incremental backup every day, and a full backup on the appropriate Friday tape. If you make some particular important changes or add some important data to your system, a backup might well be in order.
In the event of an intrusion, you can use your RPM database like you
would use tripwire, but only if you can be sure it too hasn't
been modified. You should copy the RPM database and /bin/rpm
executable to a floppy or Zip disk, and keep this copy off-line at all
times. The Debian distribution likely has something similar. (Would
someone fill me in here, until I get Debian re-installed?) See the
section on Integrity Checking for further information, and
instructions on how to do this.
It is very important that the information that comes from your system
accounting files has not been compromised, and is installed and
configured properly. Making the files in /var/log,
/var/run/utmp, and /var/log/wtmp readable, and
writable only by the root user is a good start. Knowing which tools
to use at what times is a good practice.
You can find more information on this in the User and System Accounting section.
Most Linux users install from a CDROM. Due to the fast paced nature of security fixes, new (fixed) programs are always being released. Before you connect your machine to the network, it's a good idea to check with your distribution's ftp site (ftp.redhat.com for example) and get all the updated packages since you received your distribution CDROM. Many times these packages contain important security fixes, so it's a good idea to get them installed.
You should make sure to provide user accounts with only the minimal requirements for the task they need to do. If you provide your secretary, or another general user, with an account, you might want them to only have access to a word processor or drawing program, but be unable to delete data that is not his or hers.
Several good rules of thumb when allowing other people legitimate access to your Linux machine:
sys or uucp. These accounts should be locked, and
given non-functional shells.Many local user accounts that are used in security compromises are ones that have not been used in months or years. Since no one is using them they provide the ideal attack vehicle.
The most sought-after account on your machine is the superuser account. This account has authority over the entire machine, which may also include authority over other machines on the network. Remember that you should only use the root account for very short specific tasks and should mostly run as a normal user. Running as root all the time is a very very very bad idea.
Several tricks to avoid messing up your own box as root:
rm foo*.bak, instead, first do: ls
foo*.bak and make sure you are going to delete the files you
think you are. Using echo in place of destructive commands also
sometimes works.
/bin/rm
command to ask for confirmation for deletion of files.
/etc/securetty file contains a list of terminals
that root can login from. By default (on Red Hat Linux) this is set to
only the local virtual consoles (vtys). Be very careful of adding
anything else to this file. You should be able to login remotely as
your regular user account and then use su if you need to
(hopefully over ssh or other encrypted channel), so there is no need
to be able to login directly as root.
If you absolutely positively need to allow someone (hopefully very trusted) to have superuser access to your machine, there are a few tools that can help. sudo allows users to use their password to access a limited set of commands as root. sudo keeps a log of all successful and unsuccessful sudo attempts, allowing you to track down who used what command to do what. For this reason sudo works well even in places where a number of people have root access, but use sudo so you can keep track of changes made.
Although sudo can be used to give specific users specific
privileges for specific tasks, it does have several shortcomings. It
should be used only for a limited set of tasks, like restarting a
server, or adding new users. Any program that offers a shell escape
will give the user root access. This includes most editors, for
example. Also, a program as innocuous as /bin/cat can be
used to overwrite files, which could allow root to be exploited.
Consider sudo as a means for accountability, and don't expect
it to replace the root user yet be secure.
User of computers to connect to the Internet via a dial-up line, or workstations that otherwise offer no services to external hosts can also improve their security with relatively easy modifications to the stock Linux installation.
If there is never have a need to connect to your machine from another
one on the network, the quickest solution is to simply disable
/usr/sbin/inetd from even being started. This is the master
Internet daemon, which controls some normal server services, such as
telnet, ftp, etc. If you retrieve your mail from a
remote host, and your Internet Service Provider is hosting your web
page, then most likely there is not a need to enable these services.
On stock Red Hat systems, the file /etc/rc.d/rc3.d/S50inet
controls the starting and stopping of the inetd server.
Simply rename the S50inet file to s50inet to
disable it, or see your Red Hat administration manual for further
information.
Alternatively, if you are a home dialup user, it is also possible to
deny all incoming connections using TCP Wrappers. TCP Wrappers,
/usr/sbin/tcpd, also logs failed attempts to access services,
so this can give you an idea that you are under attack. If you add new
services, you should be sure to configure it to use tcp_wrappers TCP
based. For example, a normal dial-up user can prevent outsiders from
connecting to your machine, yet still have the ability to retrieve
mail, and make network connections to the Internet. To do this, you
might add the following to your /etc/hosts.allow:
ALL: 127.
(including the ending period) And of course /etc/hosts.deny
would contain:
ALL: ALL
which will prevent external connections to your machine, yet still
allow you from the inside to connect to servers on the Internet. TCP
Wrappers can be combined with several other services, such as
sendmail and sshd to give even further control over
access. See the respective documentation for further information.
It's important for you to secure your graphical display to prevent attackers from doing things such as grabbing your passwords as you type them without you knowing it, reading documents or information you are reading on your screen, or even using a hole to gain superuser access. Running remote X applications over a network also can be fraught with peril, allowing sniffers to see all your interaction with the remote system.
X has a number of access control mechanisms. The simplest of them is host based. You can use xhost to specify what hosts are allowed access to your display. This is not very secure at all. If someone has access to your machine they can xhost + their machine and get in easily.
When using xdm (X Display Manager) to login, you get a much better access method: MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE-1. A 128bit cookie is generated and stored in your .Xauthority file. These cookies need to be transferred in confidence, and you really don't gain anything if your home directory is shared via NFS. If you need to allow a remote machine access to your display, you can use the xauth command and the information in your .Xauthority file to provide only that connection access. See the Remote-X-Apps mini-howto, available at http://sunsite.unc.edu/LDP/HOWTO/mini/Remote-X-Apps.html.
You can also use ssh (see ssh, below) to allow secure X connections. This has the advantage of also being transparent to the end user, and means that no un-encrypted data flows across the network.
Take a look at the Xsecurity(1) man page for more information
on X security. The safe bet is to use xdm(1) to login to your
console and then use ssh to go to remote sites you wish to run X
programs off of.
SVGAlib programs are typically setuid-root in order to access
all your Linux machine's video hardware. This makes them very
dangerous. If they crash, you typically need to reboot your machine to
get a usable console back. Make sure any SVGA programs you are running
are authentic, and can at least be somewhat trusted. Even better,
don't run them at all.
The Linux GGI project is trying to solve several of the problems with video interfaces on Linux. GGI will move a small piece of the video code into the Linux kernel, and then control access to the video system. This means GGI will be able to restore your console at any time to a known good state. They will also allow a secure attention key, so you can be sure that there is no Trojan horse login program running on your console. http://synergy.caltech.edu/~ggi/
identd is a small program that typically runs out of your
inetd. It keeps track of what user is running what tcp
service, and then reports this to whoever requests it.
Many people misunderstand the usefulness of identd, and so
they disable it or block all off site requests for it. identd
is not there to help out remote sites. There is no way of knowing if
the data you get from the remote identd is correct or not. There is no
authentication in identd requests.
Why would you want to run it then? Because it helps you out,
and is another data-point in tracking. If your identd has not
been compromised, then you know it is telling remote sites the
user-name or user-ID of people using TCP services. If the admin at a
remote site comes back to you and tells you a user was trying to hack
into their site, you can easily take action against that user at your
site who is misusing a service. If you are not running
identd, you will have to look at lots and lots of logs,
figure out who was on at the time, and in general take a lot more time
to track down the user.
The identd that ships with most distributions is more
configurable than many people think. You can disable identd
for specific users (they can make a .noident file), you can
log all identd requests, which is recommended, and
identd can return a uid instead of a user name or even
NO-USER. Keep in mind it is really only useful is on a network where
nobody hostile has root access. Then it can help in catching mail
forgeries, for instance.
All Linux systems support system-wide process, user, and system accounting, and it is wise to take advantage of it. You will need this information when troubleshooting a possible security incident, and your ability to address all aspects of a specific incident strongly depends on the success of this analysis.
There are quite a few things, as the Security Administrator, of which you should be aware. These include at least the following:
The system daemon called syslog is the program used to log
system events such as kernel messages, login or logout messages,
general system messages, etc.
Be sure to keep an eye on its normal operation and what gets written to it's log files, especially under the ``auth'' facility. Multiple login failures, for example, can indicate an attempted break-in. Keep in mind that the lack of information does not indicate the opposite.
Where to look for your log file will depend on your distribution. In a
Linux system that conforms to the ``Linux File-system Standard'', such as
Red Hat, you will want to look in /var/log and check messages,
mail.log, and others.
You can find out where your distribution is logging to by looking at
your /etc/syslog.conf file. This is the file that tells
/usr/sbin/syslogd (the system logging daemon) where to log
various messages.
You might also want to configure your log-rotating script or daemon to
keep logs around longer so you have time to examine them. Take a look
at the logrotate package in recent Red Hat
distributions. Other distributions likely have a similar process. It
seems that many distributions default to only logging the most basic
information, so you should spend some time and customize it for your
environment.
If your log files have been tampered with, see if you can determine when the tampering started, and what sort of things they appeared to tamper with. Are there large periods of time that cannot be accounted for? Checking backup tapes (if you have any) for untampered log files is a good idea.
Log files are typically modified by the intruder in order to cover his tracks, but they should still be checked for strange happenings. You may notice the intruder attempting to gain entrance, or exploit a program in order to obtain the root account. You might see log entries before the intruder has time to modify them.
You should also be sure to seperate the ``authpriv'' facility from other
log data, including attempts to switch users using /bin/su, login
attempts, and other user accounting information.
It is also a good idea to store log data at a secure location, such as a dedicated log server within your well-protected network. Once a machine has been compromised, log data becomes of little use as it most likely has also been modified by the intruder. It most likely of little value in a criminal investigation. It helps if the log data, which has been stored remotely, indicates when root access was gained so that logs before that point are okay.
The syslogd daemon can be configured to automatically send
log data to a central syslogd server, but this is typically
sent in cleartext data, allowing an intruder to view data as it is
being transferred. This may reveal information about your network
that is not intended to be public. There are syslog daemons available
that encrypt the data as it is being sent.
Also be aware that faking syslog messages has been reported,
with an exploit program having been published. Syslog even accepts
net log entries claiming to come from the local host without
indicating their true origin. A more secure implementation has been
written by CORE-SDI, and is available at
http://www.core-sdi.com/ENGLISH/CoreLabs/ssyslog/index.html
If possible, configure syslogd to send a copy of the most
important data to a secure system. This will prevent an intruder from
covering his tracks by deleting his login, su,
ftp, etc attempts. See the syslog.conf(5) man page,
and refer to the ``@'' option.
If you've already decided to use a central syslog server, the additional security this provides is well worth it. However, you should consider the additional overhead involved with sending this data real-time across your network.
User accounting can be used to discover information about who is currently using the system. While you cannot necessarily verify the integrity of this information once your machine has been exploited, it can be a useful tool to track the systems a particular user has logged into, what time he or she logged in, when the system was last rebooted, etc.
There are also utilities available for locking
There are several tools available to process this information,
including last(1), who(1), ac(1),
utmpdump(1) (typically for debugging only), among others.
For example, using the /usr/bin/last command, you can
view quite a bit of information about your system:
root tty1 Fri Jul 3 21:02 still logged in
reboot system boot Fri Jul 3 21:01
dave ttyp2 localhost Wed Jul 1 23:11 - 23:11 (00:00)
david ttyp2 localhost Wed Jul 1 22:47 - 22:47 (00:00)
The last(1) command, which shows a listing of last logged in users,
and lastb(1), which shows a listing of failed login attempts
(assuming /var/log/btmp exists), both consult the
/var/log/wtmp file, which contains the following
information:
See the man page for wtmp(5) for a description of any of the fields
you do not understand.
The file /var/run/utmp is the file that is consulted to find
out who is currently on the system (and primarily used by the
who(1) command). However, there may be more users currently
using the system because not all programs use utmp logging. This file
is typically truncated upon each system boot, by one of the
/etc/rc.d/rc.* files. Be sure this file is not writable by
users other than root, as it is possible to insert or delete entries
from this file otherwise. This file really serves very little
purpose.
Finally, log files are much less useful when no one is reading them. Take some time out every once in a while to look over your log files (especially when you suspect an unauthorized visitor), and get a feeling for what the look like on a normal day. Knowing this can help make unusual things stand out.
Process accounting support has also been integrated into the new kernels. To use this feature, you'll need to get ftp://sunsite.unc.edu:/pub/Linux/system/admin/accounts/acct-1.3.73.tar.gz
It no longer requires patching the kernel for this ability. This package includes several program to manage the kernel-level functions, including:
It really works quite well, and is highly recommended for systems that have a large number of users.
Having control over the resources and data your users have access to is an essential part of maintaining security. Linux provides a large number of tools including account permissions, passwords, account aging, adding and deleting of users, etc.
Some of the programs you should become familiar with to manage users and groups include:
/etc/group fileYou can read the online manual pages for these commands using a syntax similiar to the following:
user@myhost# man 8 pwunconv
This refers to pwunconv in section 8 of the manual pages.
You can find additional account management packages at ftp://sunsite.unc.edu:/pub/Linux/system/admin/accounts
The first ``layer'' of security you need to take into account is the physical security of your computer systems. Who has direct physical access to your machine? Should they? Can you protect your machine from their tampering? Should you?
How much physical security you need on your system is very dependent on your situation, and/or budget.
If you are a home user, you probably don't need a lot (although you might need to protect your machine from tampering by children or annoying relatives). If you are in a Lab environment, you need considerably more, but users will still need to be able to get work done on the machines. Many of the following sections will help out. If you are in a Office, you may or may not need to secure your machine off hours or while you are away. At some companies, leaving your console unsecured is a termination offense.
Obvious physical security methods such as locks on doors, cables, locked cabinets, and video surveillance are all a good idea, but beyond the scope of this document. :)
Make use of /etc/shutdown.allow to prevent someone
from rebooting your machine. This file is consulted when the machine
is rebooted using the Control-Alt-Del keys. It contains a list of
usernames that are authorized to reboot the machine.
Many more modern PC cases include a "locking" feature. Usually this will be a socket on the front of the case that allows you to turn an included key to a locked or unlocked position. Case locks can help prevent someone from stealing your PC, or opening up the case and directly manipulating/stealing your hardware. They can also sometimes prevent someone from rebooting your computer on their own floppy or other hardware.
These case locks do different things according to the support in the motherboard and how the case is constructed. On many PC's they make it so you have to break the case to get the case open. On some others they make it so that it will not let you plug in new keyboards and mice. Check your motherboard or case instructions for more information. This can sometimes be a very useful feature, even though the locks are usually very low quality and can easily be defeated by attackers with locksmithing.
Some cases (most notably SPARC and Mac) have a dongle on the back that if you put a cable through attackers would have to cut the cable or break the case to get into it. Just putting a padlock or combo lock through these can be a good deterrent to someone stealing your machine.
The BIOS is the lowest level of software that configures or manipulates your x86 based hardware. LILO and other Linux boot methods access the BIOS to determine how to boot up your Linux machine. Other hardware that Linux runs on has similar software (OpenFirmware on Macs and new Suns, Sun boot PROM, etc...). You can use your BIOS to prevent attackers from rebooting your machine and manipulating your Linux system.
Under Linux/x86 many PC BIOSs let you set a boot password. This doesn't provide all that much security (BIOS can be reset, or removed if someone can get into the case), but might be a good deterrent (e.g., it will take time and leave traces of tampering).
Many x86 BIOSs also allow you to specify various other good security settings. Check your BIOS manual or look at it the next time you boot up. Some examples are: disallow booting from floppy drives and passwords to access some BIOS features.
On Linux/SPARC, your SPARC EEPROM can be set to require a boot-up password. This might slow attackers down.
NOTE: If you have a server machine, and you setup a boot password, your machine will not boot up unattended. Keep in mind that you will need to come in and supply the password in the event of a power failure.
The various Linux boot loaders also can have a boot password set. Using LILO, take a look at the ``restricted'' and ``password'' settings. "password" allows you to set a boot-up password. ``restricted'' will let the machine boot _unless_ someone specifies options at the LILO: prompt (like ``single'').
Keep in mind when setting all these passwords that you need to remember them. :) Also remember that these passwords will merely slow the determined attacker. This won't prevent someone from booting from a floppy, and mounting your root partition. If you are using security in conjunction with a boot loader, you might as well disable booting from a floppy in your computer's BIOS, as well as password-protecting your computer's BIOS.
If anyone has security related information from a different boot loader, we would love to hear it. (SILO, MILO, loadlin, etc).
NOTE: If you have a server machine, and you setup a boot password, your machine will not boot up unattended. Keep in mind that you will need to come in and supply the password in the event of a power failure. ;(
If you wander away from your machine from time to time, it is nice to be able to "lock" your console so that no one tampers with or looks at your work. Two programs that do this are: xlock and vlock.
Xlock is a X display locker. It should be included in any Linux distributions that support X. Check out the man page for it for more options, but in general you can run xlock from any xterm on your console and it will lock the display and require your password to unlock.
vlock is a simple little program that allows you to lock some or all of the virtual consoles on your Linux box. You can lock just the one you are working in or all of them. If you just lock one, others can come in and use the console, they will just not be able to use your virtual TTY until you unlock it. vlock ships with RedHat Linux, but your mileage may vary.
Of course locking your console will prevent someone from tampering with your work, but does not prevent them from rebooting your machine or otherwise disrupting your work. It also does not prevent them from accessing your machine from another machine on the network and causing problems.
More importantly, it does not prevent someone from switching out of the X Window System entirely, and going to a normal virtual console login prompt, or to the VC that X11 was started from, and suspending it, thus obtaining your privileges. For this reason, you might consider only using it while under control of xdm. At the very least, start X in the background, and log out of the console.
Intruders are constantly attempting different mechanisms to attack your system. You must be able to detect these varying attempts, and know what to do when they happen. You should also be able to distinguish the normal operating conditions from an actual attack.
You must be able to determine things like whether or not there really was an intrusion, to what extent the attack occured.
Intrusion Detection is the method in which a security administrator uses to detect the presence of an unauthorized intruder. An Intrusion Detection System (IDS) are the combination of tools that a security administrator uses to detect the intrusion. Briefly, the available types of intrusion detection include:
Being capable of detecting an intrusion is as important as being able to stop it once it happens. It is important that you are able to detect the subtle signs left by an intruder during his attack of your system.
Suspicious signs of intrusion include at least the following:
$HOME/ directory such
as $HOME/.bashrc for modified $PATH entries, as well
as changes in system configuration files in /etc
In order to determine if an intruder has violated your system, you must be familiar with the normal system administration tools, and be able to use them to find the ``footprint'' a cracker may have left behind. This procedure can be relatively easy, or practically impossible, depending on how much preparation you have done, as well as the stage you've detected the intruder, and how skilled the intruder is.
There are pointers throughout this document that list the various tools available. Some of the tools and methods you should become familiar with include:
syslog(8) which is responsible for
logging many system events that are helpful in tracking connections to
your system, as well as local system events.
last(1),
lastcomm(1), and netstat(8) commands. These are
available to show valuable information about the users, commands, and
connections on your system. More information on these commands are
available in the User Security section.
There are many intrusion detection tools available for Linux, and many new tools are constantly becomming available. While the majority of the tools are host-based intrusion detection tools, there are a number of network-based tools as well.
There are also several intrusion detection tools available at http://www.eng.auburn.edu/users/doug/second.html including a tool called klaxton which basically sets a trap for an intruder, then notifies you when some is ``doorknob rattling''.
A very good way to determine if you have an unwanted visitor is to check your local files for possible trojan horses, missing files, files that are larger or smaller than they are supposed to be, etc.
Fortunately, there are several tools that can verify the file
integrity. Many Linux distributions use RPM for their package
management, which inherently has integrity checking. Also available
is the well-known program called tripwire.
tripwireTripwire runs a number of checksums on all your important binaries and config files and compares them against a database of former, known-good values as a reference. Thus, any changes in the files will be flagged.
It's a good idea to install tripwire onto a floppy, and then physically set the write protect on the floppy. This way intruders can't tamper with tripwire itself or change the database. Once you have tripwire setup, it's a good idea to run it as part of your normal security administration duties to see if anything has changed.
You can even add a crontab entry to run tripwire from your floppy every night and mail you the results in the morning. Something like:
# set mailto
MAILTO=kevin
# run tripwire
15 05 * * * root /usr/local/adm/tcheck/tripwire
will mail you a report each morning at 5:15am.
Tripwire can be a godsend to detecting intruders before you would otherwise notice them. Since a lot of files change on the average system, you have to be careful what is cracker activity and what is your own doing, which is a solid reason to keep track of the status of the binaries on your system.
A company called Visual Computing Corporation now apparently has been given exclusive rights to continue development of tripwire, originally developed at Purdue University. It looks to be so-far-so-good, as there is still a working version for Linux. You can find more information from them at http://www.visualcomputing.com
The Red Hat Package Manager (RPM) program includes the ability to verify all packages that it has installed on the system.
RPM has facilities for verifying that a package is not corrupt or has components missing. A program added or removed by a cracker will not match the original and RPM will generally report a verification failure.
Now, when your system is compromised, you can use the command:
root# rpm -Va
to verify each file on the system. See the RPM man page, as there are
a few other options that can be included to make it less verbose.
Keep in mind you must also be sure your RPM binary has not been
compromised. RPM can also be combined with PGP to check a package's
signature. Typical output might look like the following:
..5....T /bin/login
should sound alarm bells. RPM produces the following useful output fields:
This means that every time a new RPM is added to the system, the RPM database will need to be re-archived. You will have to decide the advantages versus drawbacks. Also, keep in mind that it won't verify programs that RPM did not install.
Specifically, the files /var/lib/rpm/fileindex.rpm and
/var/lib/rpm/packages.rpm most likely won't fit on a single
floppy. Compressed, each should fit on a separate floppy. Consider
storing this (as well as the actual /bin/rpm executable!!) on
a Zip cartrige.
Intruders often either modify, delete, or replace existing files in order to either cover their tracks, assist them in gaining access, or to gather further information.
Ensuring the integrity of the files and programs on your system is vital in intrusion detection. Several means can be used to determine if files have been tampered with on your system:
user@host# /usr/bin/find / -ctime -1 -print
Read the File System Security section for tips on
scanning your filesystem for changed files, as well as setuid and sgid
files.
Intruders may attempt to breach your network's by physical infitration as well as via the network. Keep in mind that one system can be used to penetrate many others, so securing one machine is as important as securing another.
The first thing to always note is when your machine was rebooted. Since Linux is a robust and stable OS, the only times your machine should reboot is when YOU take it down for OS upgrades, hardware swapping, or the like. You should always investigate machine reboots.
Check for signs of tampering on the case and computer area. Although many intruders clean traces of their presence out of logs, it's a good idea to check through them all and note any discrepancy.
One of the more common ways intruders gain access to multiple systems on your network is by employing a packet sniffer on a already compromised host. This software-based ``sniffer'' just listens on the Ethernet port for things like ``password'' and ``login'' and ``su'' in the packet stream and then logs the traffic after that. This way, attackers gain passwords for systems they are not even attempting to break into. Clear text passwords are very vulnerable to this attack.
An attacker doesn't even need to compromise a system to do this, they could also bring a laptop or PC into your building and tap into your net.
Using SSH, or other encrypted password methods, thwarts this attack. Things like APOP for POP email accounts also prevents this attack. (Normal POP logins are very vulnerable to this, as is anything that sends clear text passwords over the wire.)
If you are using syslog to send your data to a central log
server, consider that the data is sent in clear text, and much
information can be gathered from this data. Consider using a secure
implementation of syslog, which encrypts and compresses the data
before it is sent. See the Using Syslog section for more
information on configuring syslogd(8) securely.
A few minutes of preparation and planning ahead before putting your systems online can help to protect your system, and the data that is stored on it.
This section discusses some of the methods in which you can use to secure the files on your system, some general guidelines for improving the overall security of the files on your system, and some ideas for preventing problems from occuring in the first place. It also discusses the commands to use to modify the permissions and ownership of files and directories on your system.
Before we discuss some of these methods of improving file system security, it is important to have an understanding of basic Linux file security, ownership, and what each of the fields from a file listing actually mean.
To display the ownership and permissions of a file on your system, use
the long-listing option, as well as the display all
files option to the ls(1) command. A typical
/bin/ls -la command might show the following, with the first
line being a field marker:
|----1----|-2--|---3----|----4-----|---5--|-----6------|---7-----|
1. drwxrwxr-x 24 root users 1024 Aug 19 00:05 .
2. drwxr-xr-x 22 root root 1024 Aug 11 22:04 ..
3. drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 1024 Jun 19 03:40 Mail
4. -rw-rw-r-- 1 dave security 43244 Jul 20 14:11 README
5. drwxrwsr-x 17 dave security 1024 Jul 31 01:48 Security
[More not shown]
Each of these fields provide useful information to the security administrator. First, a description of each field (as shown from left to right), then a more in-depth explanation of the most important ones. The numbers down the left side represent the line numbers, which will be referred to later.
Security and
Mail)
Continuing where we left off in the previous section, we can now discuss some of the fields described above. Particularly, field one and fields three and four are the most exiciting.
Linux separates access control on files and directories according to three characteristics: owner, group, and other. There is always exactly one owner, any number of members of the group, and everyone else.
The files within each of these categories have specific permissions with which they are accessed. File permissions, including regular files, special files (such as FIFOs, sockets, etc), or symbolic links (which dereference the permissions to the file they point to) can have any one, or any, of the following:
Symbol Permission Description
-------------------------------------------------------------------
r Read Can be opened to read the contents
w Write Can be modified, including appending
and deleting
x Execute Can execute the file if it is a
program or shell script
s Special Perm setuid or setgid permission
- Access Denied Cannot be read, written, or executed,
depending on the position of the `-'
The read, write, and execute permissions should be pretty clear as to their meaning. However, the ``s'' symbol may need to explanation. The next two sections address this symbol.
When the set user ID access mode is set in the owner permissions, and the file is executable, processes which run it are granted access to system resources based on the owner of the file.
Be extremely careful when setting these permissions. Any user who runs that file assumes the permissions of the owner of the executable file, instead of the user who created the process. This is the cause of many ``buffer overflow'' exploits, typically resulting in superuser privileges.
The setuid permission is shown as an s in the file
permissions. For example, the setuid permission on the
/usr/bin/passwd command enables normal users to read and
write an otherwise inaccessible /etc/passwd file:
user@myhost $ ls -l /etc/shadow /etc/passwd /usr/bin/passwd
-r-------- 1 root root 659 Jul 25 19:40 /etc/shadow
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 711 Jul 25 19:40 /etc/passwd
-r-sr-xr-x 1 root bin 15613 Apr 27 12:29 /usr/bin/passwd
You will notice that the s takes the place of the execute bit
in the example above. This special permission mode really has no
meaning unless the file also has execute permission as well.
In the example we see the /etc/shadow file is only readable
by root, yet the /usr/bin/passwd file enables us to write our
password changes there. When either a normal user, a member of the
bin group, or even anyone else executes
/usr/bin/passwd, it is really run as root, due to
the ``s'' bit set in the owner's permissions field.
Keep in mind that setuid has a different meaning when applied to directories. See the explanation for directories that follows.
It is advisable to keep setuid and setgid binaries
on your system to a minimum, in order to reduce the possiblity of
their being exploited. You should never execute an suid or sgid
binary as a normal user, without knowing what it does. And certainly
do not arbitrarily modify an otherwise non-setuid binary to have setuid
permissions, simply for convience.
If set in the group permissions, this bit controls the ``set group ID''
status of a file. This behaves the same way as setuid, except the group
is affected instead. The file must also be executable for this to
have any effect. Upon execution of a file with this bit set, the
effective group ID for the process is changed to the group owner of
the file and a user is granted access based on the permissions given
to that group. The wall(1) program, /usr/bin/wall,
is used to ``write all'' users that are logged on to the system at the
same time. It must be set group ID in order to have enough permission
to write to terminals which do not belong to the user running the
program:
user@myhost$ ls -l /usr/bin/wall
-r-xr-sr-x 1 root tty 5492 May 7 14:02 /usr/bin/wall
We see here that everyone has the ability to execute the binary. It
is owned by root, and a member of the tty group.
Having each user on the system a member of the tty is not
practical, and neither is changing the group to which the wall program
belongs.
It is advisable to keep setuid and setgid binaries
on your system to a minimum, in order to reduce the possiblity of
their being exploited. You should never execute an suid or sgid
binary as a normal user, without knowing what it does. And certainly
do not arbitrarily modify an otherwise non-setuid binary to have setuid
permissions, simply for convience.
Keep in mind that setgid has a different meaning when applied to directories. See the explanation for directories that follows.
You can protect the files in a directory, and its subdirectories, by denying access to the entire directory itself. The permissions of a directory typically have a slightly different meaning than the equivilent permissions on a file. Additional permissions are available on directories, including setuid, setgid, and the sticky bit. Directory entries can have any one, or any, of the following:
Symbol Permission Description
---------------------------------------------------------------------
r Read List file contents
w Write Add, modify or remove files in the
directory
x Execute Open or execute files in the directory
- Access Denied Cannot be read, written, or executed,
depending on the position of the `-'
s Special Mode Set group ID bit is active (only in
``group'' section
t Special Mode Save text attribute
It is important to understand the meanings of each of these symbols, and how you can use them to protect your files. Many of these symbols may be clear as to its meaning, but perhaps the other modes deserve a more in-depth explanation.
The read symbol indicates the ability to list the contents
within the directory, assuming you also have access to open the
directory.
The write symbol indicates the ability to add, remove, or
modify files within the directory, also assuming you have access to
open the directory. It is important to note that write access on a
file within a directory is not required to delete it!
The Save Text (also known as the sticky bit) is an
option really only available to directories. If the sticky bit is set
on a directory, then a user may only delete files that the user owns
or for which he has explicit write permission granted, even when he
has write access to the directory. This is designed for directories
which are world-writable, but where it may not be desirable to allow
any user to delete files at will. The sticky bit is seen as a
``t'' in a long directory listing.
For example, the /tmp directory is typically world-writable,
so everyone has a place in which to write temporary files. The
/tmp directory looks like this in a long-listing:
user@myhost$ ls -ld /tmp
drwxrwxrwt 3 root root 2048 Aug 23 16:25 /tmp
This shows that everyone can read, write, and access the directory.
But the ``t'' shows us that only the user (and root, of
course) that created a file there can delete that file.
The chmod(1) command controls the sticky bit permissions.
For example, you can add the sticky bit to a directory using the
following:
root@myhost# ls -ld spool
drwxrwxrwx 3 root root 2048 Aug 23 16:25 spool
root@myhost# chmod +t spool
root@myhost# ls -ld spool
drwxrwxrwt 3 root root 2048 Aug 23 16:25 spool
While you can use the sticky bit on files, it does not really serve a purpose on Linux systems, as it did on UNIX systems of yester-year.
Additionally, this option should not be used casually. Instead,
create a directory in the user's home directory to which he or she can
write temporary files. The TMPDIR environment variable can be set,
and programs that use the tempnam(3) system call will look for
this variable and use it, instead of /tmp See the section on
Writing Secure Code for a further explanation why there are
hidden security problems with /tmp
If you set the setgid bit on a directory, files created in that directory will have the same group ownership as the directory itself, rather than the primary group of the user that created the file.
This attribute is useful when multiple users need to access specific files, but still require isolation from other files. Having them work from a common directory with the setgid attribute set means that any files created there will obtain the permissions of that common directory. For example, Joe and Mary might be in different primary groups, but need to collaborate on a common project. In this case, creating a common directory can be used to which both have write access.
You can control the setgid attribute on a directory with the following command:
joe@myhost$ ls -ld common_dir
drwxrwxr-x 2 joe dev 1024 Aug 23 17:03 common_dir
joe@myhost$ chmod g+s common_dir
joe@myhost$ ls -ld common_dir
drwxrwsr-x 2 joe dev 1024 Aug 23 17:03 common_dir
We can see here that the ``s'' in place of the execute bit in
the group permissions indicates all files written to the
common_dir will now belong to group dev
The chmod(1) command controls the changing of file and
directory permissions. Only the owner (or superuser, of course) can
change the permissions of a file or directory.
The chmod(1) command has two modes of operation. The first
one, called absolute mode, works by explictly specifying the
permissions using an octal value, such as 644 or 755. The second mode
of operation, called symbolic mode, works by using
combinations of letters and symbols to add or remove permissions.
Using the octal values method of changing permissions can be more difficult to use at first, but you'll find it is faster and easier, once you have made the inital time investment, and learned how to do it correctly.
The octal value for specifying permissions works by specifying a numeric argument for the permissions for which you wish to change. These numbers are used in sets of three to set permissions for owner, group, and other (everyone else). The following table shows what each octal value means:
Value Permissions Description
---------------------------------------------------------------------
0 --- No permission
1 --x Execute only
2 -w- Write only
3 -wx Write and execute (shell scripts need
read permission to be executed)
4 r-- Read only
5 r-x Read and execute
6 rw- Read and write
7 rwx Read, write, and execute (full
control)
Using the table above, you can use chmod(1) to modify file
and directory permissions. It helps to disect each of the sections,
and explain one at a time. Given the following example:
user@myhost$ ls -l
-rwxrw-r-- 1 dave sysadmin 36012 Aug 21 01:06 run.pl
We see from this example that dave is the owner, and the file
belongs to group sysadmin. From the information in the first
field, we see this is a normal file, as shown by the - as the
left-most character in the left-most field. The owner of this perl
script, dave, has permission to read, write, and execute this
file. The group, sysadmin has permission to read and write
to it (including deleting it). Everyone else can only read this file.
Using that information, we can look more closely at the permissions
that file has:
Access Class user group other
Symbolic Mode r w x r w - r - -
Binary Mode 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0
Octal Equiv 7 6 4
The octal equivilent of the binary number is generated using powers of
two. Each position that is enabled, as shown by a 1 instead
of a 0, represents a power of two. Specifically, from right
to left, we have 2^0, or 1, then 2^1, or 2, then 2^2, or 4. Adding
the enabled values corresponding to the bits that are enabled gives
the octal number we use with chmod(1).
One might decide to remove the ability for other to read this
file. You can do this using chmod(1) as follows:
user@myhost$ ls -l run.pl
-rwxrw-r-- 1 dave sysadmin 36012 Aug 21 01:06 run.pl
user@myhost$ chmod 760 run.pl
user@myhost$ ls -l run.pl
-rwxrw---- 1 dave sysadmin 36012 Aug 21 01:06 run.pl
We see here that run.pl has now been modified to deny read
access (as well as all other types of access) to users other than
those in group sysadmin, and the owner (dave in this
case)
Using the same format as used to describe file permissions shown above, we will continue, and explain how changing directory permissions using octal values work.
The octal value for specifying permissions works by specifying a numeric argument for the permissions for which you wish to change. These numbers are used in sets of three to set permissions for owner, group, and other (everyone else).
The primary difference between permissions on files and permissions on directories is access control. Permissions on directories typically indicate accessibility. Hint: You cannot execute a directory ;->
The following table shows what each octal value means, as well as what access control is given for the corresponding permissions:
Value Permissions Description
---------------------------------------------------------------------
0 --- No permission
1 --x Access - gives ability to work with programs
and files in the directory that they already
know the name of, but hides all others
2 -w- Write - really has no meaning on its own
3 -wx Write and execute - ability to write to files
you already know the name of
4 r-- Read only - really has no meaning on its own
5 r-x Read and execute - gives ability to enter
directory, and list contents, but cannot write
or delete
6 rw- Read and write - really has no meaning on its
own
7 rwx Read, write, and access - ability to list
contents of directory, as well as read and
write in it
Using the table above, you can use chmod(1) to modify file
and directory permissions. It helps to disect each of the sections,
and explain one at a time. Given the following example:
user@myhost$ ls -l
drwxr-x--- 1 dave sysadmin 1024 Aug 21 01:06 games
We see from this example that dave is the owner, and the
directory belongs to group sysadmin. From the information in
the first field, we see this is a directory, as shown by the
d as the left-most character in the left-most field. The
owner of this directory, dave, has permission to read,
write, and access this directory. The group, sysadmin has
permission to access the directory, as well as list its contents.
Files within this directory with the appropriate read permission would
also be able to be read. Other users are not allowed to access this
directory at all. Using that information, we can look
more closely at the permissions that directory has:
Access Class User Group Other
Symbolic Mode r w x r - x - - -
Binary Mode 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0
Octal Equivilent 7 5 0
The octal equivilent of the binary number is generated using powers of
two. Each position that is enabled, as shown by a 1 instead
of a 0, represents a power of two. Specifically, from right
to left, we have 2^0, or 1, then 2^1, or 2, then 2^2, or 4. Adding
the enabled values corresponding to the bits that are enabled gives
the octal number we use with chmod(1).
One might decide to give other users the ability for other to
access this file, and list the contents within it. You can do this
using chmod(1) as follows:
user@myhost$ ls -ld games
drwxr-x--- 1 dave sysadmin 1024 Aug 21 01:06 games
user@myhost$ chmod 755 games
user@myhost$ ls -ld games
drwxr-xr-x 1 dave sysadmin 1024 Aug 21 01:06 games
We see here that games has now been modified to permit access
to users other than those in group sysadmin, and the owner
(dave in this case)
The symbolic mode is perhaps the easier of the two methods to
use to change file permissions. It is probably the one you should
work with first if you are just learning this. This section discusses
the basic means in which one can change the permissions of a file or
directory, using chmod(1)
The symbolic mode of chmod(1) works on the concept of access
classes. These classes consist of (u)ser, which is the owner
of the file, (g)roup, of which the user is a member, and
(o)ther, which is those users not a member of the group, or
the owner of the file. The final mode is (a)ll, which
consists of all three of the previous modes.
Using these modes, in conjunction with the desired permissions, you can modify the access to a particular file or directory. The permissions are one or more of (r)ead, (w)rite, and e(x)ecute.
Combining the access class and the new permissions desired, with an
operator, gives you the ability to change the permissions on a file or
directory. The available operators are +, which means to add
to the existing permissions, -, which means to subtract from
the existing permissions, and =, which means set the new
permissions equal to those provided.
For example, ``a+rw'' means to add read and
write permission to all three groups of users.
Using ``go=r'' means to set the group and
other fields to only have read access, regardless of
what they had previously.
A more complete example is as follows:
dave@myhost$ ls -l nsmail
drwxr-xr-x 2 dave dave 1024 Aug 7 00:17 nsmail
dave@myhost$ chmod go=rx nsmail
dave@myhost$ ls -l nsmail
drwx------ 2 dave dave 1024 Aug 7 00:17 nsmail
To remove write access for everyone from a file, use the minus sign:
dave@myhost$ chmod a-w myfile
dave@myhost$ ls -l myfile
-r--r--r-- 1 dave dave 424 Aug 23 23:10 myfile
You can control the setuid and setgid on files and directories, as
well as the sticky bit, using the symbolic mode with
chmod(1). Such an example might be as follows:
1. root@myhost# ls -l
2. drwxr-xr-x 2 root sysadmin 1024 Aug 24 01:18 groupdir
3. -rwxr-x--- 1 root sysadmin 8077 Aug 24 01:19 myprog
4. drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 1024 Aug 24 01:18 spool
5. root@myhost# chmod g+ws groupdir
6. root@myhost# chmod u+s myprog
7. root@myhost# chmod o+t,a+w spool
8. root@myhost# ls -l
9. drwxrwsr-x 2 root sysadmin 1024 Aug 24 01:18 groupdir
10. -rwsr-x--- 1 root sysadmin 8077 Aug 24 01:19 myprog
11. drwxrwxrwt 2 root root 1024 Aug 24 01:18 spool
This is an interesting example which uses many of the features of
chmod(1). Lines 1 through 4 show the long-list of the file
and two directories before any changes were made. We see here that
groupdir and myprog are members of group
sysadmin. Another point of interest is that no one but the
owner of these files (root in all these cases) is able to
write to the file or directories.
Line 5 shows how to add both group write permission, and
setgid access to the groupdir directory. This will
enable members of group sysadmin to write files there, and
retain the sysadmin group.
Line 6 shows how to add the setuid bit to the myprog binary.
This means that any user in the sysadmin group that executes
this binary is granted access based on the owner of the file, in this
case root, rather than the user who executed it.
Line 7 shows how to add the sticky bit to the spool
directory, as well as add write permission for all
users. This is a publicy-accessible directory, and writable by all.
However, only those who actually own the files can delete them.
Lines 8 through 11 show the directories and file after the modifications have been made.
This section discusses the methods in which an administrator can
change the owner and group to which a file belongs. Use the
chown(1) command to change a files owner (can only be done by
root), and chgrp to change the group to which a file or
directory belongs.
As with any security-related task, you should use caution when changing the ownership of a file or directory. Most times you can add a user to a group without having to change the ownership. You should also re-evaluate the permissions of the file or directory after you have made the change.
To use the chown(1), supply the new username and the files
you wish to change:
root@myhost# ls -l myfile
-r--r--r-- 1 fred sysadmin 424 Aug 23 23:10 myfile
root@myhost# chown root myfile
root@myhost# ls -l myfile
-r--r--r-- 1 root sysadmin 424 Aug 23 23:10 myfile
You can also change ownership of files recursively by using the
chown -R option. When you use the -R option, the
chown command descends through the directory and any
subdirectories below that one, changing the ownership.
If a symbolic link is encountered, the group ownership is changed on the file to which the link points.
This section is very similiar to the previous section. It discusses
the methods in which an administrator can change the groups to which a
file belongs. Use the chgrp(1) command to change group
ownership. In order for a normal user to change a file's group from
one to another, the user must be a member of both groups.
To use the chgrp(1), supply the new group name and the files
you wish to change:
root@myhost# ls -l myfile
-r--r--r-- 1 fred sysadmin 424 Aug 23 23:10 myfile
root@myhost# chgrp root myfile
root@myhost# ls -l myfile
-r--r--r-- 1 fred root 424 Aug 23 23:10 myfile
You can also change group ownership of files recursively by using the
chgrp -R option. When you use the -R option, the
chgrp command descends through the directory and any
subdirectories below that one, changing the ownership.
You can also use the chown(1) command to change both the
owner and group at the same time. Use a colon between the desired new
owner and group. For example:
root@myhost# ls -l myfile
-r--r--r-- 1 fred sysadmin 424 Aug 23 23:10 myfile
root@myhost# chown root:root myfile
root@myhost# ls -l myfile
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 424 Aug 23 23:10 myfile
Notice the permissions do not change simply because you have changed the ownership. Use caution here to be sure you are not inadvertantly giving permission to someone that should not have it.
If a symbolic link is encountered, the group ownership is changed on the file to which the link points.
The umask command can be used to determine the default file creation mode on your system. It is the octal complement of the desired file mode. If files are created without any regard to their permissions settings, a user could inadvertently give read or write permission to someone that should not have this permission.
The umask for the creation of new executable files is calculated as follows:
777 Default Permissions
-022 Subtract umask value, for example
-----
755 Allowed Permissions
So in this example we chose 022 as our umask. This shows us
that new executables that are created are given mode 755,
which means that the owner can read, write, and execute the binary,
while members of the group to which the binary belongs, and all
others, can only read and execute it.
The umask for the creation of new text files is calculated as follows:
666 Default Permissions
-022 Subtract umask mask, for example
-----
644 Allowed Permissions
This example shows us that given the default umask of 666,
and subtracting our sample umask value of 022, new text files
are created with mode 644, which states that the owner can
read and write the file, while members of the group to which the file
belongs, and everyone else can only read the new file.
Typically umask settings include 022, 027, and 077, which is the most
restrictive. Normally the umask is set in /etc/profile, so it
applies to all users on the system. The file creation mask must be
set while keeping in mind the purpose of the account. Permissions
that are too restrictive may cause users to start sharing accounts or
passwords, or otherwise compromise security. For example, you may
have a line that looks like this:
# Set the user's default umask
umask 033
Be sure to make root's umask to at least 022, which will disable write
and execute permission for other users, unless explicitly changed
using chmod(1).
If you are using Red Hat Linux, and adhered to their user and group ID creation scheme (User Private Groups), it is only necessary to use 002 for a umask with normal users. This is due to the fact that the default configuration is one user per group.
In addition to setting the user's default umask, you should be sure you are aware of the umask value that is set in startup scripts as well. Any files that are created during the boot process may be created with the default umask of 666 if it is not explictly specified.
Additionally, any servers that are started at boot time, such as
inetd(8), may inherit the umask at boot time, which in turn
will be passed down to the services, and servers, that it controls.
The umask value that the FTP server, spawned by inetd(8)
uses, for example, can be easily overlooked, allowing the potential
for too lenient permissions on files.
In this specific example, the FTP server has command-line options for controlling umask values. Many do not, however. For this reason, you might consider creating a file that gets run at system boot time, before any others, that simply explictly sets the umask to a known value.
You should regularly monitor your systems for any unauthorized use of
the setuid or setgid permissions to gain superuser
privileges.
setuid and setgid files on your system are a
potential security risk, and should be monitored closely. Because
these programs grant special privileges to the user who is executing
them, it is necessary to ensure that insecure programs are not
installed. A favorite trick of crackers is to exploit ``setuid
root'' programs, then leave a setuid program as a back
door to get in the next time, even if the original hole is plugged.
Find all setuid and setgid programs on your system,
and keep track of what they are, so you are aware of any changes which
could indicate a potential intruder. Use the following command to
find all setuid and setgid programs on your
system:
root@myhost# find / -type f -perm +6000 -ls
You can discriminately remove the setuid or setgid
permissions on a suspicious program with chmod(1), then
change it back if you absolutely feel it is necessary.
World-writable files, particularly system files, can be a security hole if a cracker gains access to your system and modifies them. Additionally, world-writable directories are dangerous, since they allow a cracker to add or delete files as he wishes. To locate all world-writable files on your system, use the following command:
root@myhost# find / -perm -2 ! -type l -ls
and be sure you know why those files are writable. In the normal
course of operation, several files will be writable, including some
from /dev.
Unowned files may also be an indication an intruder has accessed your system. You can locate files on your system that do not have an owner, or belong to a group with the command:
root@myhost# find / -nouser -o -nogroup
The following is a list of general guidelines you should be aware of when configuring the files on your hosts.
setuid and setgid programs to be run from there.
Use the nosuid option in /etc/fstab for partitions
that are writable by others than root. You may also wish to use
nodev and noexec on user's home partitions, as well
as /var, which prohibits execution of programs, and creation
of character or block devices, which should never be necessary anyway.
/etc/fstab with suitable restrictions.
Typically, using nodev, nosuid, and perhaps
noexec, are desirable.
unlimited as is the
default. You can control the per-user limits using the
resource-limits PAM module and /etc/pam.d/limits.conf. For example,
limits for group `users' might look like this:
@users hard core 5000
@users hard nproc 50
@users hard rss 5000
This says to limit the creation of core files, restrict the number of processes to 50, and restrict memory usage per user to 5 Meg.
/var/log/wtmp and /var/run/utmp files contain
the login records for all users on your system. Its integrity must be
maintained because it can be used to determine when and from where a
user (or potential intruder) has entered your system. These files
should also have 644 permissions, without affecting normal
system operation.
/etc) are usually mode
644 (-rw-r--r--), and owned by root. Depending on your sites
security requirements, you might adjust this. Never leave any system
files writable by a group or everyone. Some configuration files,
including /etc/shadow, should only be readable by
root, and directories in /etc should at least not be
accessible by others.
setuid shell scripts are a serious security risk, and for
this reason the kernel will not honor them. Regardless of how secure
you think the shell script is, it can be exploited to give the cracker
a root shell.
An integral part of host and network security is data encryption. There are vast resources of information on the Internet available on the topic of data security. Various data encryption mechanisms are available for use with Linux.
This section attempts to discuss some of the encryption features that are available for use with Linux. For an overview of encryption and cryptography, be sure to consult the RSA Cryptography FAQ, available at http://www.rsa.com/rsalabs/newfaq/
One of the most important security features used today are passwords. It is important for both you and all your users to have secure, unguessable passwords. Most of the more recent Linux distributions include password programs that do not allow you to set a easily guessable password. Make sure your passwd program is up to date and has these features.
Most UNIXs (and Linux is no exception) primarily use a one-way
encryption algorithm, called DES (Data Encryption Standard) to encrypt
your passwords. This encrypted password is then stored in (typically)
/etc/passwd (or less commonly) /etc/shadow. When you
attempt to login, whatever you type in is encrypted again and compared
with the entry in the file that stores your passwords. If they match,
it must be the same password, and you are allowed access. Although DES
is a two-way encryption algorithm (you can code and then decode a
message, given the right keys), the variant that most unicies use is
one-way. This means that it should not be possible to reverse the
encryption to get the password from the contents of
/etc/passwd (or /etc/shadow).
Any entry in the password file with a user-ID of ``0'' (zero) is a root entry, regardless of what it's called.
Choose effective passwords. There is a great deal of information available on the Internet regarding choosing good passwords. A password minimum of 6 characters should be enforced, and 8 characters provides a significant improvement in security. You can find more information on improving password security at ftp://sunos-wls.acs.ohio-state.edu:/pub/security/Dan_Klein_password_security.ps.Z which is titled ``Foiling the Cracker: A Survey of, and Improvements, to Password Security''.
Brute force attacks, such as ``Crack'' or ``John the Ripper'' (see below) can often guess passwords unless your password is sufficiently random. PAM modules (see below) allow you to use a different encryption routine with your passwords (MD5 or the like).
You can go to http://consult.cern.ch/writeup/security/security_3.html for information on how to choose a good password.
There is also a quick list of things to keep in mind when choosing a password available at http://www.alw.nih.gov/Security/Docs/passwd.html and should be consulted when developing your security policy.
Public Key Cryptography, such as that which is used for PGP, involves cryptography that uses one key for encryption, and one key for decryption. Traditionally, cryptography involves using the same key for encryption that is used for decryption. This "secret key" must be known to both parties, and somehow transferred from one another securely.
Public key encryption alleviates the need to securely transmit the key that is used for encryption by using two separate keys, a public key and a private key. Each person's public key is available by anyone to do the encryption, while at the same time each person keeps his or her private key to decrypt messages encrypted with the correct public key.
There are advantages to both public key and private key cryptography, and you can read about those differences in the RSA Cryptography FAQ, listed at the end of this section.
PGP (Pretty Good Privacy) is well supported on Linux. Versions 2.6.2 and 5.0 are known to work well. For a good primer on PGP and how to use it, take a look a the PGP FAQ. http://www.pgp.com/service/export/faq/55faq.cgi
Be sure to use the version that is applicable to your country, as due to export restrictions by the US Government, strong-encryption is prohibited from being transferred in electronic form outside the country.
US export controls are now managed by EAR (Export Administration Regulations). They are no longer governed by the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR).
There is a good introductory guide explaning public key cryptography, that includes graphic illustrations, available at PC Magazine Online, available http://www8.zdnet.com/pcmag/features/inetsecurity/howencrypt.htm
There is also a step-by-step guide for configuring PGP on Linux available at http://mercury.chem.pitt.edu/~angel/LinuxFocus/English/November1997/article7.html It was written for the International version of PGP, but is easily adaptable to the United States version. You may also need a patch for some of the latest versions of Linux, which is available at ftp://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/Linux/apps/crypto.
More information on cryptography can be found in the RSA cryptography FAQ, available at http://www.rsa.com/rsalabs/newfaq/. Here you will find information on such terms as "Diffie-Hellman", "public-key cryptography", "Digital Certificates", etc.
An excellent 147-page publication written by the government describing practically all you'll need to know unless you're a cryptographer is available at http://csrc.nist.gov/nistpubs/800-2.txt
There is a project working on a free re-implementation of PGP with open source. See the GNU Privacy Guard web page for more information, available at http://www.d.shuttle.de/isil/crypt/gnupg.html
Often times users ask about the differences between the various security and encryption protocols, and how to use them. While this isn't an encryption document, it is a good idea to explain briefly what each are, and where to find more information.
IPSec is an effort by the IETF to create cryptographically secure
communications at the IP network level, which also provides
authentication, integrity, access control, and confidentiality. IPsec
is the basic host-to-host security mechanism. It is appropriate for
use any time address-based protection would have been used, including
with such programs as rsh and rlogin. If and when
platforms support user-based keying, this scope may be expanded.
Information on IPSec and Internet draft can be found at
http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/ipsec-charter.html. You can
also find links to other protocols involving key management, and an
IPSec mailing list and archives.
A good starting point for Linux implementations of Virtual Private Networking is available at http://www.imib.med.tu-dresden.de/imib/Internet/index.html
One of the Linux implementations, which is being developed at the University of Arizona, uses an object-based framework for implementing network protocols called ``x-kernel'', and can be found at http://www.cs.arizona.edu/xkernel/hpcc-blue/linux.html. Most simply, the x-kernel is a method of passing messages at the kernel level, which makes for an easier implementation.
There is also an implementation of RSA's Secure Wide Area Networking, S/WAN, called FreeSWAN, available at http://www.xs4all.nl/~freeswan/
A description of S/WAN is available at http://www.sunworld.com/swol-06-1996/swol-06-swan.html
Microsoft Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol is also available for Linux. You can find more information on this at http://www.pdos.lcs.mit.edu/~cananian/Projects/PPTP/. More information on this protocol is available from the Linux PPTP page.
An implementation of PPTP that works with Linux masquerading is available at http://bmrc.berkeley.edu/people/chaffee/linux_pptp.html as well as kernel patches, and a pointer to more information.
It is well known now that PPTP is insecure, and really should only be used in existing installations. Rhino9, the security research group, have put together an exploit, as well as more documentation on the protocols involved. You can find it at http://www.rhino9.ml.org/texts/pptp.doc
As with other forms of cryptography, it is not distributed with the kernel by default due to export restrictions.
SSH and stelnet are programs that allow you to login to remote systems and have a encrypted connection.
SSH is a suite of programs used as a secure replacement for rlogin, rsh and rcp. It uses public-key cryptography to encrypt communications between two hosts, as well as for user authentication. This can be used to securely login to a remote host or copy data between hosts, while preventing man-in-the-middle attacks (session hijacking) and DNS spoofing. It will perform data compression on your connections, and secure X11 communications between hosts. The SSH home page can be found at http://www.cs.hut.fi/ssh/
You can also use SSH from your Windows workstation to your Linux SSH server. There are several freely available Windows client implementations, including the one at http://guardian.htu.tuwien.ac.at/therapy/ssh/ as well as a commercial implementation from DataFellows, at http://www.datafellows.com.
There is also an open source implementation of SSH being developed. You can find more information about this at http://www.net.lut.ac.uk/psst/
SSLeay is a free implementation of Netscape's Secure Sockets Layer protocol, developed by Eric Young. It includes several applications, such as Secure telnet, a module for Apache, several databases, as well as several algorithms including DES, IDEA and Blowfish.
Using this library, a secure telnet replacement has been created that does encryption over a telnet connection. Unlike SSH, stelnet uses SSL, the Secure Sockets Layer protocol developed by Netscape. You can find Secure telnet and Secure FTP by starting with the SSLeay FAQ, available at http://www.psy.uq.oz.au/~ftp/Crypto/
An SSL-based POP3 daemon is also available at http://mike.daewoo.com.pl/computer/stunnel/
SKIP, which provides IP-Level cryptography, much like SSH, is available for Linux. A quick overview from http://www.skip.org states:
SKIP secures the network at the IP packet level. Any networked application gains the benefits of encryption, without requiring modification. SKIP is unique in that an Internet host can send an encrypted packet to another host without requiring a prior message exchange to set up a secure channel. SKIP is particularly well-suited to IP networks, as both are stateless protocols. Some of the advantages of SKIP include:
There is a wealth of information available at http://www.skip.org as well as the actual Linux implementation available at http://www.tik.ee.ethz.ch/~skip/
Newer versions of the Red Hat Linux distribution ship with a unified authentication scheme called "PAM". PAM allows you to change on the fly your authentication methods, requirements, and encapsulate all local authentication methods without re-compiling any of your binaries. Configuration of PAM is beyond the scope of this document, but be sure to take a look at the PAM web site for more information. http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/libs/pam/index.html
Just a few of the things you can do with PAM:
Within a few hours of installing and configuring your system, you can prevent many attacks before they even occur. For example, use PAM to disable the system-wide usage of dot-rhosts files in user's home directories by adding these lines to /etc/pam.d/login:
#
# Disable rsh/rlogin/rexec for users
#
login auth required pam_rhosts_auth.so no_rhosts
The primary goal of this software is to provide a facility for secure (against eavesdropping, including traffic analysis, and faked message injection) subnetwork interconnection across an insecure packet network such as the Internet.
CIPE encrypts the data at the network level. Packets travelling between hosts on the network are encrypted. The encryption engine is placed near the driver which sends and receives packets.
This is unlike SSH, which encrypts the data by connection, at the socket level. A logical connection between programs running on different hosts is encrypted.
CIPE can be used in tunneling, in order to create a Virtual Private Network. Low-level encryption has the advantage that it can be made to work transparently between the two networks connected in the VPN, without any change to application software.
Summarized from the CIPE documentation:
The IPSec standards define a set of protocols which can be used (among other things) to build encrypted VPNs. However, IPSec is a rather heavyweight and complicated protocol set with a lot of options, implementations of the full protocol set are still rarely used and some issues (such as key management) are still not fully resolved. CIPE uses a simpler approach, in which many things which can be parameterized (such as the choice of the actual encryption algorithm used) are an install-time fixed choice. This limits flexibility, but allows for a simple (and therefore efficient, easy to debug...) implementation.
Further information can be found at http://www.inka.de/~bigred/devel/cipe.html
As with other forms of cryptography, it is not distributed with the kernel by default due to export restrictions.
Kerberos is an authentication system developed by the Athena Project at MIT. When a user logs in, Kerberos authenticates that user (using a password), and provides the user with a way to prove her identity to other servers and hosts scattered around the network.
This authentication is then used by programs such as rlogin to allow the user to login to other hosts without a password (in place of the .rhosts file). This authentication method can also used by the mail system in order to guarantee that mail is delivered to the correct person, as well as to guarantee that the sender is who he claims to be.
The overall effect of installing Kerberos and the numerous other programs that go with it is to virtually eliminate the ability of users to "spoof" the system into believing they are someone else. Unfortunately, installing Kerberos is very intrusive, requiring the modification or replacement of numerous standard programs.
You can find more information on kerberos at http://www.veritas.com/common/f/97042301.htm and the code can be found at http://nii.isi.edu/info/kerberos/
[From: Stein, Jennifer G., Clifford Neuman, and Jeffrey L. Schiller. "Kerberos: An Authentication Service for Open Network Systems." USENIX Conference Proceedings, Dallas, Texas, Winter 1998.]
Shadow passwords are a means of keeping your encrypted password information secret from normal users. Normally this encrypted password is stored in your /etc/passwd file for all to read. They can then run password guesser programs on it and attempt to determine what it is. Shadow passwords save this information to a /etc/shadow file that only privileged users can read. In order to run shadow passwords you need to make sure all your utilities that need access to password information are recompiled to support it. PAM (above) also allows you to just plug in a shadow module and doesn't require re-compilation of executables. You can refer to the Shadow-Password HOWTO for further information if necessary. It is available at http://sunsite.unc.edu/LDP/HOWTO/Shadow-Password-HOWTO.html It is rather dated now, and will not be required for distributions supporting PAM.
If for some reason your passwd program is not enforcing non easily guessable passwords, you might want to run a password cracking program and make sure your users passwords are secure.
Password cracking programs work on a simple idea. They try every word in the dictionary, and then variations on those words. They encrypt each one and check it against your encrypted password. If they get a match they are in. Also, the "dictionary" may include usernames, Star Trek ships, foreign words, keyboard patterns, etc...
There are a number of programs out there...the two most notable of which are ``Crack'' and ``John the Ripper'' http://www.false.com/security/john/index.html . They will take up a lot of your CPU time, but you should be able to tell if an attacker could get in using them by running them first yourself and notifying users with weak passwords. Note that an attacker would have to use some other hole first in order to get your passwd (Unix /etc/passwd) file, but these are more common than you might think.
Linux provides several mechanisms in which to encrypt data on a filesystem.
CFS is a way of encrypting entire directory trees and allow users to store encrypted files on them. It uses a NFS server running on the local machine. RPMs are avail at http://www.replay.com/redhat/ and more information on how it all works is at: ftp://ftp.research.att.com/dist/mab/
TCFS improves on CFS, adding more integration with the file system, so that it's transparent to any users using the file system that it's encrypted. more information at: http://edu-gw.dia.unisa.it/tcfs/
It also need not be used on entire filesystems. It works on directories trees as well.
There are two implementations of DES encryption on the loopback device also available. It is available at ftp://ftp.csua.berkeley.edu/pub/cypherpunks/filesystems/linux Patches to the 2.0 kernel and the mount executable are available at ftp://ftp.is.co.za/linux/local/kernel/crypto/loopback-device-berkeley-recent/ Patches to the 2.1 kernel, written by Andrew E. Mileski, aem@netcom.ca are available at ftp://ftp.is.co.za/linux/local/kernel/crypto/loopback-device-aem
This is a description of the kernel configuration options that relate to security, and an explanation of what they do, and how to use them.
As the kernel controls your computer's networking, it is important that the kernel is very secure, and the kernel itself won't be compromised. To prevent some of the latest networkworking attacks, you should try and keep your kernel version current. You can find new kernels at ftp://ftp.kernel.org
Your terminal servers, or servers with many users, can be further protected by employing Solar Designer's <solar@false.com> experimental ``Secure Linux'' kernel patches. As this is still experimental, and not a guaranteed fix, this patch is typically only advisable for hosts with many users, and not servers such as web or email servers. His work states he has done the following:
/tmp/tmpSee the documentation that comes with the software for more information.
Much of the security work being done these days is to prevent someone from ``upgrading'' their normal user privileges, and becomming root. If we could remove that ability entirely, it may help to solve many of the exploits we currently see.
Andrew Morgan has written a series of kernel patches, called Linux-Privs works towards implementing POSIX.1e (formerly POSIX 6) security model under Linux. It is a scheme that more precisely defines device and application permissions. Andrew states, Typically, the user will have to authenticate himself to such an applciation before it will perform its privileged task. This new scheme for system privilege lends itself well to restricting privileged access to the system and reduces the risk of intruders or poorly written applications running amok on the system.
There is an introductory document available at http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/libs/security/linux-privs/doc/linux-privs.html/linux-privs.html which discusses the features he has implemented, as well an outline for those which still need to be worked on. Some of the available abilities include Access Control Lists (ACL), Mandatory Access Control (MAC), and Kernel-level auditing.
To quote James T. Dennis <answerguy@ssc.com> in the July 1998, issue of Linux Gazette (available at http://www.ssc.com/lg/)
One approach would be the POSIX.1e ``capabilities'' (which are more like VMS style ``privileges'' than true ``capabilities''). There is a bit of preliminary work being done on this in the 2.1.x kernels --- but nothing is likely be usable in 2.2 (so you're looking at Linux 2.4 before there is "stable" support for any of that).
Another approach is to limit the damage that ``root'' can do using something like the BSD securelevel features. Last I heard on the Linux kernel mailing list they had dropped plans to put in simple ``securelevel'' support in favor of a ``more flexible'' approach --- which would mesh better with the eventual POSIX.1e (``Orange Book'') work.
His discussion is really based on further securing the chroot() function call using ``capabilities'', but has some generally useful descriptions as well. You can find this discussion at http://www.ssc.com/lg/issue30/tag_chroot.html
Briefly, it will allow you to disable access to functions such as mknod(), chroot(), mount(), etc, and move the privileges to the executable itself, rather than simply by being the root user.
There is further information in the Linux kernel 2.1.x sources, as well as the June 25 issue of Linux Weekly News available at http://www.lwn.net/980625/
This option should be enabled. Source routed frames contain the entire path to their destination inside of the packet. This means that routers the packet goes thru does not need to inspect the packet, and just forwards it on. This could lead to data entering your system that may be a potential exploit.
This option is necessary if you are going to configure your machine as a firewall, do masquerading, or wish to protect your dial-up workstation from someone entering via your PPP dial-up interface.
If you enable IP forwarding, your Linux box essentially becomes a router. If your machine is on a network, you could be forwarding data from one network to another, and perhaps subverting a firewall that was put there to prevent this from happening. Normal dial-up users will want to disable this, and other users should concentrate on the security implications of doing this. Firewall machines will want this enabled, and used in conjunction with firewall software.
You can enable and disable IP forwarding dynamically using the following command:
root# echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
and disable it with the command:
root# echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
This file (and many other files in /proc) will always appear to be
zero length, but in fact aren't. This is a newly introduced kernel
feature, so be sure you are using a kernel 2.0.33 or later.
This option gives you information about packets your firewall received, like sender, receipient, port, etc.
Generally this option is disabled, but if you are building a firewall or a masquerading host, you will want to enable it. When data is sent from one host to another, it does not always get sent as a single packet of data, but rather it is fragmented into several pieces. The problem with this is that the port numbers are only stored in the first fragment. This means that someone can insert information into the remaining packets for your connection that aren't supposed to be there. It could also prevent a teardrop attack against an internal host that is not yet itself patched against it.
SYN Attack is a denial of service (DoS) attack that consumes all the resources on your machine, forcing you to reboot. We can't think of a reason you wouldn't normally enable this. In the 2.1 kernel series this config option mearly allows syn cookies, but does not enable them. To enable them, you have to do:
root@myhost# echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_syncookies
This is an option that is available in the 2.1 kernel series that will sign NCP packets for stronger security. Normally you can leave it off, but it is there if you do need it.
This is a really neat option that allows you to analyze the first 128 bytes of the packets in a userspace program, to determine if you would like to accept or deny the packet, based on its validity.
There are a few block and character devices available on Linux that will also help you with security.
The two devices /dev/random and /dev/urandom are
provided by the kernel to retrieve random data at any time.
Both /dev/random and /dev/urandom should be secure
enough to use in generating PGP keys, SSH challenges, and other
applications where secure random numbers are requisite. Attackers
should be unable to predict the next number given any initial sequence
of numbers from these sources. There has been a lot of effort put in
to ensuring that the numbers you get from these sources are random in
every sense of the word random.
The only difference is that /dev/random runs out of random
bytes and it makes you wait for more to be accumulated. Note that on
some systems, it can block for a long time waiting for new
user-generated entry to be entered into the system. So you have to
use care before using /dev/random. (Perhaps the best thing
to do is to use it when you're generating sensitive keying
information, and you tell the user to pound on the keyboard repeatedly
until you print out "OK, enough".)
/dev/random is high quality entropy, generated from measuring
the inter-interrupt times etc. It blocks until enough bits of random
data are available.
/dev/urandom is similar, but when the store of entropy is
running low, it'll return a cryptographically strong hash of what
there is. This isn't as secure, but it's enough for most applications.
You might read from the devices using something like:
user@myhost# head -c 6 /dev/urandom | mmencode
This will print (approximately) six random characters on the console,
suitable for password generation. You can find mmencode(1)
(perhaps also known as mimencode on some systems) in the metamail mail
package.
See /usr/src/linux/drivers/char/random.c for a description of
the algorithm.
Thanks to Theodore Y. Ts'o, Jon Lewis, and others from Linux-kernel for helping me (Dave) with this.
The diversity of today's networks exposes your system to a wide variety of possible security-related incidents. In order to protect your systems, you must be aware of these exploits in order to protect yourself from them. While previous sections explained the types of people to protect against, and the reasons they attack, this section attempts to explain the types of exploits that are typically performed to break into a computer system.
There are several exploits that won't be mentioned here, such as Macro Code Attacks and Virus Infections, of which Linux and Unix itself in general is not susceptible. However, any Windows-based systems that connect to it will be suseptible, via shared filesystems, electronic mail, etc.
There are now several programs available to check your system for the most common exploits. The rootshell site, http://www.rootshell.com has several of these programs, and there is also the following available ftp://ftp.fu-berlin.de/unix/security/chkexploit/
Worms are problems which replicate themselves, but unlink viruses they do not modify other programs and are not triggered by user actions. Worms are self-contained programs that attack systems or other programs without changing them in any way, and that typically use networks to accomplish this. The Internet Worm, which reportedly gained access to more than 6,000 Unix systems, flooded the Internet with so many access requests that it became unusable. These are no where near as common as they once were.
A trojan horse is a program that is an unauthorized, self-contained program that is not self-replicating. It is often hidden or given a misleading name to deter suspicion.
A Trojan Horse is named after the fabled ploy in Homer's great literary work. The idea is that you put up a program or binary that sounds great, and get other people to download it and run it as root. Then, you can compromise their system while they are not paying attention. While they think the binary they just pulled down does one thing (and it might very well), it also compromises their security.
You should take care of what programs you install on your machine. RedHat provides MD5 checksums, and PGP signs RPM files so you can verify you are installing the real thing. Other distributions have similar methods. You should never run any binary you don't have the source for or a well known binary as root! Few attackers are willing to release source code to public scrutiny.
Although it can be complex, make sure you are getting the source for some program from it's real distribution site. If the program is going to run as root make sure either you or someone you trust has looked over the source and verified it.
Cracking attacks are attacks perpetrated by network intruders, or crackers (formally known as hackers). These attacks take the form of network intrusions, which are break-ins into remote systems, or the use of the services they provide, without authorization. The number of cracker attacks is proliferating more rapidly than any other type of incident, in large part because the Internet provides broad connectivity without intrinsic security mechanisms.
Information security professionals have long accepted the premise that more incidents are caused by insiders (e.g., company employees and contractors) than by outsiders. Many feel this trend is now reversing, and news of organizations' incurring major financial losses as the result of network intrusions is becoming commonplace.
Obviously, neither type of exploit should be taken lightly.
Users often log on to workstations and then leave them unattended for long periods of time. This allows unauthorized individuals physical access to the workstations and to the organization's systems. An attacker can enter the office and use the workstation to attack numerous systems at a commercial site.
Attacks involving direct physical access can be extremely costly, because the attacker is often an insider who knows exactly where valuable data and applications reside on the system.
See the section on physical security for more information on how to protect your system.
Spoofing is a complex technical attack that is made up of several components. It is a security exploit that works by tricking computers in a trust-relationship that you are someone that you really aren't. Spoofing of network connections involves forging an IP source address to trick the destination into thinking you are someone you really aren't. Spoofing of network services involves using poorly configured (or misconfigured) applications, typically SMTP, to trick the client, server, or receipient into thinking you are someone you are not.
Using the most recent implementations of the available service can help to protect against this ``masquerading''. Preventing internal IP addresses from seemingly entering your firewall from the outside is something that should be a mandatory addition to your rulebase. There is some information on preventing DNS spoofing available at http://www.sunworld.com/swol-11-1997/swol-11-bind.html
A general guide to securing DNS is available at http://www.psionic.com/papers/dns-linux.html
A great reference of spoofing information is available at http://www.unitedcouncil.org/text.html including the excellent article published in Volume Seven, Issue Forty-Eight of Phrack, available here http://www.unitedcouncil.org/spoof/IPSpoofing.txt This paper will help you understand the low-level TCP details.
A Denial of Service (DoS) attack is one where the attacker prevents legimitate users from accessing a service. Denial of service attacks either try to make some resource too busy to answer legitimate service requests, or to deny legitimate users access to a machine.
Also of significant concern is a denial of service attack that is really intended to keep the victim busy while really the intruder is impersonating the host, preventing it from replying. These are typically referred to as ``man in the middle'' attacks.
Denial of service attacks have increased greatly in recent years. Some of the more popular and recent ones are listed below. Note that new ones show up all the time, so this is just a few examples.
If you are ever under a ping flood attack, use a tool like tcpdump available at ftp://ftp.ee.lbl.gov/tcpdump.tar.Z (although it should be part of your Linux vendor's distribution) and is used to determine where the packets are coming from (or appear to be coming from), then contact your provider with this information. Ping floods can most easily be stopped at the router level or by using a firewall.
Someone has put together a further discussion of the Ping 'o Death attack, and is available at http://www.sophist.demon.co.uk/ping/
Much work is being done in this area by some very capable people to proactively catch these problems before further exploits are discovered. The Linux Security Audit Group is working on auditing many of the stock packages that vendors ship with their distributions. You can follow their efforts, or even help evaluate programs by joining the security audit list, security-audit-subscribe@ferret.lmh.ox.ac.uk and using ``subscribe'' in the body of the message. You can find the mailing list archives at http://www.nas.nasa.gov/Pubs/Mail/archive/linux-security-audit/ This is strictly an auditing list. It does not discuss issues regarding configuring your system to be more secure, reporting an exploit, etc. Do not expect to find information here about steps to perform an exploit.
Be sure to keep your subscription information, as it is very distracting to see unsubscribe requests being sent to the list. You can unsubscribe from the list by sending ``unsubscribe security-audit'' in the body of the message to security-audit-unsubscribe@ferret.lmh.ox.ac.uk
Chris Evans is doing a fine job of maintaining the mailing list, as well as a list of outstanding security issues, specifically, those in Red Hat 5.1. You can find this list at http://www-jcr.lmh.ox.ac.uk/~chris/rhbugs.txt
Some of the types of exploits performed on flaws in programming consist of at least the following:
See the Web Links section for URLs to the most common Linux vendor security updates, and the Mail Links section for addresses for notification from most security vendors. Additionally, there are several user-contributed programs that will monitor particular ftp sites for changes, and either notify you when they change, or update automatically.
/tmp are typically used for temporary files, such as are
created by the line printer daemon, X11, accounting programs, etc. A
potential for guessing the names of the files written to this
directory exists. As a result, poorly coded programs may have the
potential for being exploited by writing into a prexisting file. For a
more complete explanation, see the Writing Secure Code
section.
Misconfigured, or unnecessary services pose a significant threat to both host and network security. Exportable filesystems, inherently insecure services, too lenient configuration of a service, can all lead to a compromise.
Be sure to turn off any service that is not being used, and remove any executables that are not used. See the Network Security and Host Security for further information.
There is certainly nothing easier than gathering the latest exploits from http://www.rootshell.com and trying them out on a list of machines.
Typically by the time the exploits are available on the Internet, the vendor has distributed a patched version of the susecptible program. Be sure to install these updated versions, or at the least disable the service until you can do so. See the Contacts section of this document for the locations of vendors' updates.
Please see the WWW Security FAQ http://www-genome.wi.mit.edu/WWW/faqs/www-security-faq.html for more information.
You can also find information on further securing Apache at http://www.apache.org/docs/misc/security_tips.html
Linux can also be used as a full-featured utility to protect your internal network.
There are currently several firewall systems that run on Linux. Packet filters, application gateways (proxy gateways), IP masquerading, Network Address Translation (NAT), as well as IP accounting are all available on Linux.
Firewalls are a means of restricting what information is allowed into and out of your local network. Typically the firewall host is connected to the Internet and your local network, and the only access from your network to the Internet is through the firewall. A firewall is not just a program that runs on a Linux box. A firewall establishes a perimeter that controls all entry and exit points to your internal network. The strongest firewall won't protect you from a modem on one of the PCs inside your network.
There are a number of types and methods of setting up firewalls. Linux
machines make pretty good low cost firewalls. Firewall code can be
built right into 2.0 and higher kernels. The ipfwadm(8) user
space tool configures the kernel-based packet filtering, allowing you
to change what types of network traffic you allow on the fly. You can
also log particular types of network traffic.
Firewalls are a very useful and important technique in securing your network. It is important to realize that you should never think that because you have a firewall, you don't need to secure the machines behind it. This is a fatal mistake.
It is important you are familiar with not only the methods in which you can configure a firewall, but also which type of firewall gets used in which situation. This document, http://www.sunworld.com/swol-01-1996/swol-01-firewall.html is an excerpt from the O'Reilly book Building Internet Firewalls which is practically mandatory reading if you've never worked with firewalls first.
There are, however, several very well written documents available on the Internet, including some of these:
There is also a wealth of Linux-specific firewall-related material available. Some of them are on very specific topics, but others are excellent general overviews, written to address problems with documenting the proper procedures to use the tools Linux has available. Some of the documents you should check out include:
ipfwadm(8) is available
here
http://linux.samiam.org/firewall.html and should be read in
conjunction with the Firewall-HOWTO.
You can find some general ipfwadm(8) examples, as well as a security overview, in two parts, at:
The most full-featured firewall available for Linux is the Firewall Toolkit (FWTK), written by Trusted Information Systems. Their web page states: The TIS Internet Firewall Toolkit is a set of programs and configuration practices designed to facilitate the building of network firewalls. Components of the toolkit, while designed to work together, can be used in isolation or can be combined with other firewall components. The toolkit software is designed to run on UNIX systems using TCP/IP with a Berkeley-style ``socket'' interface. You can find an overview of its features, a description of how it works, and the source code itself at http://www.tis.com/prodserv/fwtk/fwtkoverview.html. Trusted Information Systems, now really Network Associates http://www.nai.com/, has some generally good information also on their web site.
You can download the source for the Firewall Toolkit at ftp://ftp.tis.com/pub/firewalls/toolkit/fwtk-v1.3.tar.Z The documentation may be downloaded seperately from ftp://ftp.tis.com/pub/firewalls/toolkit/fwtk-doc-only.tar.Z
The Linux Journal wrote an excellent article on configuring the Firewall Toolkit in their Issue 25. The transcript of that article is available at http://www.ssc.com/lj/issue25/1204.html
Additionally, it may be necessary to patch the downloaded version of the Firewall Toolkit. You can find these patches at ftp://ftp.tisl.ukans.edu/pub/security/firewalls/fwtkpatches.tgz
The ipfwadm(8) tool is used to build packet filtering rules
on the 2.0 series kernels. With this tool, you can accept or deny
packets based on their source or destination address, port number,
protocol, including TCP, UDP, and ICMP, as well as monitor number of
packets and bytes transferred. You can find a well-written document
on implementation, and the source code at
http://www.xos.nl/linux/ipfwadm/. Your Linux vendor should
have also included the latest version with your distribution.
The Linux Firewall HOWTO is also available for some sample implementations and brief descriptions. You can find the Firewall-HOWTO at http://sunsite.unc.edu/LDP/HOWTO/Firewall-HOWTO.html It is intended to be used with ipfwadm(8).
In addition to a kernel-based packet filter for the 2.0 kernel series,
there is also IP Chains, which is a complete rewrite of the
code used in the ipfwadm(8) utility. The IP Chains
package is also available in the 2.0 kernels, but only with a kernel
patch. It is primarily intended to be used with the 2.1, and 2.2
stable kernels when they are released. Quoting Paul Russell, the
author,
Paul.Russell@rustcorp.com.au it was written because The
current Linux firewalling code doesn't deal with fragments, has 32-bit
counters (on Intel at least), doesn't allow specification of protocols
other than TCP, UDP or ICMP, can't make large changes atomically,
can't specify inverse rules, has some strange quirks, and can be tough
to manage (making it prone to user error).
More information on IP Chains can be found at
http://www.adelaide.net.au/~rustcorp/ipfwchains/HOWTO.html
which is an introduction on what it can do, and how to use it. There
are also tips on converting your old ipfwadm(8) rules to use the
new program and format.
The sf Firewall is an TCP/IP packet filter with quite a few features. Quoting from their web site, ``In addition to a human-readable configuration language, we implemented dynamic rules, variables and time-outs, extensive logging, alerting and counter intelligence, RIP, FTP, ICMP, IGMP, UDP and TCP filtering and offer control of all IP fields. The firewall also prevents packet address spoofing.''
It is available at http://www.ifi.unizh.ch/ikm/SINUS/firewall.html You can find the documentation and quite a few configuration examples at http://www.ifi.unizh.ch/ikm/SINUS/sf-doc/
http://www.ejj.net/ sonny/fwconfig/fwconfig.html
Linux also supports masquerading of IP packets. With this ability, and using the ipfwadm(8) tool, all packets being forwarded through a Linux box have their source address translated to the IP address of the Linux box. On the packet's return trip, the proper address gets substituted into the translated address, and delivered to the proper host.
Not only does this provide ambiguity for the host behind the Linux box, it also has the advantage of preserving the amount of registered IP addresses that must be used, where instead only a single IP address for the Linux box is needed.
Masquerading is typically used for a home network, to allow both your Windows machine, as well as your Linux box, to use the same dialup connection. It can also be used on your firewall to provide security for the hosts behind the Linux box, and as previously stated, preserving the amount of necessary registered IP addresses in an attempt to solve the address space problem the Internet is currently suffering from.
More information can also be found in the IP-Masquerade mini-howto, available at http://sunsite.unc.edu/LDP/HOWTO/mini/IP-Masquerade.html and the IP Masquerading home page, available at http://ipmasq.home.ml.org/
Linux also implements Network Address Translation (NAT) which is another method of masquerading a number of hosts behind one IP address (called m:1 translation), but is far more advanced. It includes m:1 translation, (that is, it translates m hosts to 1 addresses), m:n translation, m!=n translation, referred to as dynamic NAT, as well as m=n translation, referred to as static NAT.
Michael Hasenstein, M.Hasenstein@rocketmail.com has written some excellent documentation, which explains each aspect very clearly, including how and why he wrote it, and is available at http://www.csn.tu-chemnitz.de/HyperNews/get/linux-ip-nat.html
The ability to audit software for existing vulnerabilities, as well as preventing them from happening in code that you write, are important qualities to develop. There is a wealth of information available on the Internet to inform you of the type of vulnerabilities, and how they are created, as well as preventing your code from becomming a future vulnerability.
/tmp ExploitsOn Monday, March 9, 1998, Rogier Wolff
R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl
summarized on the
linux-security@redhat.com mailing list the issues with an
exploit that has recently been found. By being able to predict a
temporary filename that will be created in the world-writable
directory /tmp, it may be possible for a user (especially
files created by the root user) to unknowingly reveal confidential
information about the system. He wrote:
Every now and then a new ``exploit'' turns up of some program that uses tmp files. The first solution was ``sticky bits'', but since links exist (that's a LONG time), that solution is inadequate.
The problem is that you put an object (link/pipe) in the place where you expect a program to put its tempfile, and wait for another user to open the tempfile. Usually a method can be found that would allow you to gain access to rights of the user opening the tempfile.
Sometimes a program already checks for the existence of the file, and creates it if its not there. This is not atomic, and cannot easily be made secure. The standard trick is to create a symlink that you move back and forth between the ``expected'' file name and some ``storage place''. On operating systems, like HPUX and SunOS, this has a much better than 50% chance of success because they have synchronous directory updates. On operating systems that have an efficient buffer cache, like Linux, the chances are much worse. But that won't save your machine from someone gaining root access: the bad guys simply write a program to try it 100 times.
The Unix philosophy is that things that should be easy also -=are=- easy. So, a program that has setuid rights might need to be careful not to give those rights away. A non-setuid program should not have to worry about buffer overruns (you can crash the program, wow!). It should similarly not have to worry about temporary files.
/tmp directory, that's private for every userid. The discussion continued on stating that each of these solutions may have problems, but I don't believe there is one sure-fire solution to this problem yet.
You should be sure to use temporary filenames that are not easily
guessable. The mktemp(1) and mkstemp(1) program
exists to create a more secure temporary file.
There are quite a few documents out there that describe some procedures to write secure code.
setuid programs and
other documents from him on writing secure code
http://seclab.cs.ucdavis.edu/~bishop/secprog.html Some
of that goes back to 1986 -- Whew.
setuid
programs.Some of these links (Specifically the Microsoft one) was pulled from the recent bugtraq summary which can be found at http://geek-girl.com/bugtraq/1998_3/0215.html My first Secure Programming section appeared in May, '98.
Buffer overflows are an attempt at exploiting a bug in a software program that does not allocate enough space to store data in a buffer, then using this to write past the end of the buffer, on top of other memory space, outside of its normal stack area.
To quote Aleph 1 <aleph1@underground.org>,
``smash the stack'' [C programming] n. On many C implementations it is possible to corrupt the execution stack by writing past the end of an array declared auto in a routine. Code that does this is said to smash the stack, and can cause return from the routine to jump to a random address. This can produce some of the most insidious data-dependent bugs known to mankind.
You can find more information and the rest of this article at http://www.2600.com/phrack/p49-14.html titled ``Smashing The Stack For Fun And Profit'' written by Aleph 1.
You can find a full description of the problem at http://l0pht.com/advisories/bufero.html titled ``How to Write Buffer Overflows''.
There is a fully indexed page of this information available at http://reality.sgi.com/nate/machines/security/
Solar Designer, the well-known Linux kernel hacker, has several times provided secure solutions to otherwise non-secure issues. His secure-linux document and selection of kernel patches helps to prevent such things as:
/tmp, which prevents non-root users from
creating hard links to files they don't own.
/tmp, which disallows writing to
pipes not owned by the user in directories with sticky bit set.
/proc prevents non-root users from seeing
statistics for processess other than their own, as well as making
information about existing network connections unavailable.His document also explains the drawbacks to using these patches. You can find the patch, and more information at http://www.false.com/security/linux/index.html.
StackGuard, a library and compiler technique, attempts to minimize the effects of these problems by fixing it at the library level, rather than at the individual program source level, with only a minimal performace penalty. You can find more information on this at http://www.cse.ogi.edu/DISC/projects/immunix/StackGuard/
Incident response must be highly organized in order to be effective. You must have a response plan developed ahead of time. There are six stages of activity in a formal incident response. This is a brief description of these stages. For a more involved description, contact CERT at http://www.cert.org/
Organizations should outline the objectives for incident handling. You must determine the minimal acceptable level of security controls for systems and networks, and implement these controls. Ensuring that all systems and network components have at least a minimum level of security often prevents incidents from becoming widespread. Security response team should be available 24 hours per day.
The preparation stage of incident response should entail the installation and testing of software that will be used when an incident occurs. Intrusion detection software can be very effective, for example, as can software that verifies the integrity of programs and data, such as tripwire, or the Red Hat package manager. Waiting to obtain useful software can be a costly mistake.
You can find more information on detecting signs of intrusion at CERTs Security Improvement site http://www.cert.org/security-improvement/modules.html
It is important to be able to recognize suspicious signs that an incident has occurred. Becuase detection must often rely on extremely subtle signs, the use of incident-detecting software is a standard practice in systems security efforts. System accounting logs are usually a dependable source of information about possible incidents, if they are configured correctly initially. In many organizations, the system administrator is required to inspect each system's log data on a daily basis. There are also programs available that can scan log data for the most common types of exploits, and provide a summary for the administrator to track and investigate.
Every detail about a possible intrusion should be recorded. Preserving as many details as possible will help the incident response team to understand how the attack occurred and how it affected the victim system.
Most organizations now employ the use of firewall systems to increase the security of the internal networks. Examining the firewall logs can lead to intrusion attempts. There are also programs available to process firewall logs, and produce a report of possible successful and failed intrusions.
Be sure to see the Intrusion Detection section of this document as well.
The third stage of incident response is containment. Once you have realized there is an attack going on, you need to be sure it does not spread further to other systems, or produce further damage to your system. Spotting a security compromise under way can be a tense undertaking. How you react can have large consequences. Hasty actions can cause more harm than the attacker would have.
If the compromise you are seeing is a physical one, odds are you have spotted someone who has broken into your home, office or lab. You should notify your local authorities. In a lab setting you might have spotted someone trying to open a case or reboot a machine. Depending on your authority and procedures, you might ask them to stop, or contact your local security people.
If you have detected a local user trying to compromise your security, the first thing to do is confirm they are in fact who you think they are. Check the site they are logging in from. Is it the site they are normally in from? no? Then use a non electronic means of getting in touch. For instance, call them on the phone or walk over to their office/house and talk to them. If they agree that they are on, you can ask them to explain what they were doing or tell them to cease doing it. If they are not on, and have no idea what you are talking about, odds are this incident requires further investigation. Look into such incidents , and have lots of information before making any accusations.
If you are unable to disconnect the network (if you have a busy site,
or you do not have physical control of your machines), the next best
step is to use something like TCP Wrappers or ipfwadm to deny
access from the intruders site.
If you can't deny all people from the same site as the intruder, locking the users account will have to do. Note that locking an account is not an easy thing. You have to keep in mind .rhosts files, FTP access, and a host of backdoors).
After you have done one of the above (disconnected network, denied access from their site, and/or disabled their account), you need to kill all their user processes and log them off.
You should monitor your site well for the next few minutes, as the attacker will try and get back in. Perhaps using a different account, and/or from a different network address.
The first priority of containment is to determine what is at risk if the incident spreads. If at all possible, a backup of the existing status of the machines should be made. There are several reasons for this, including keeping evidence of an attack for legal reasons, as well as keeping the data in the event the exploit deletes data.
Containing a network attack is often a matter of shutting the system down, which is in many cases, the safest response. If the system contains sensitive information, you might consider disconnecting the system from the network, booting to single user mode, or configuring the firewall to deny incoming requests.
In some cases, allowing an attacker to continue is an effective way to track the attacker's actions. Obviously, this should only be done with prior arrangements being made with the incident advisory group. Several people have tracked intruders in the past, and written their reports for others to learn from. Consider reading ``UNIX Backdoors'' or ``Protecting Your Site By Breaking Into It''.
If you are able to determine what means the attacker used to get into your system, you should try and close that hole. For instance, perhaps you see several FTP entries just before the user logged in. Disable the FTP service and check and see if there is an updated version or any of the lists know of a fix.
Check all your log files, and make a visit to your security lists and pages and see if there are any new common exploits you can fix. You can find Caldera security fixes here http://www.caldera.com/tech-ref/security/. Red Hat has not yet seperated their security fixes from bugfixes, but their distribution errata is available at http://www.redhat.com/errata It is very likely that if one vendor has released a security update, that most other Linux vendors will as well.
If you don't lock the attacker out, they will likely be back. Not just back on your machine, but back somewhere on your network. If they were running a packet sniffer, odds are good they have access to other local machines.
So you have either detected a compromise that has already happened or you have detected it and locked (hopefully) the offending attacker out of your system. Now what?
The fourth stage of incident response includes getting rid of the problem. Obviously in order to eradicate the problem, you need to know where the source of the problem is. Generally it is difficult to find the exact cause of the exploit.
Network intrusions are generally more difficult to eradicate, because attackers can use any system on a network to launch an attack on other addressable systems. Network-based exploits may require patches to the operating system, or routers on the network, which will take time to find and fix.
An excellent document describing what steps to take upon finding out you've been compromised is available by CERT at http://www.cert.org/tech_tips/root_compromise.html
The fifth stage of intrusion detection is rebuilding, and coming back online after the exploit. Restoration entails returning a system to its normal operational status, or ensuring that the system and the data are exactly as they were before the incident occurred. Ensuring that every aspect of the system is the same as before a security incident occurred is typically a labor-intensive activity. It requires that the integrity of every file in the compromised system be examined and restored.
For this reason, administrators typically backup important data, and reinstall the operating system from CDROM. Performing an integrity check or restoring the services from a backup is only the first step. The response team should then verify the integrity of services with nonproduction data in a test environment before they are allowed to resume in production mode.
The first thing is to assess the damage. What has been compromised? If you are running an Integrity Checker like Tripwire you can make a tripwire run and it should tell you. If not, you will have to look around at all your important data.
Since Linux systems are getting easier and easier to install, you might consider saving your config files and then wiping your disk(s) and reinstalling, then restoring your user files from backups and your config files. This will insure that you have a new clean system. If you have to backup files from the compromised system, be especially cautious of any binaries that you restore as they may be trojan horses placed there by the intruder.
Re-installation should be considered mandatory upon an intruder obtaining root access. Additionally, you'd like to keep any evidence there is, so having a spare disk in the safe may make sense.
Then you have to worry about how long ago the compromise happened, and whether the backups hold any damaged work.
Having regular backups is a godsend for security matters. If your system is compromised, you can restore the data you need from backups. Of course some data is valuable to the attacker to, and they will not only destroy it, they will steal it and have their own copies, but at least you will still have the data.
You should check several backups back into the past before restoring a file that has been tampered with. The intruder could have compromised your files long ago, and you could have made many successful backups of the compromised file!!!
Of course, there are also a raft of security concerns with backups. Make sure you are storing them in a secure place. Know who has access to them. (If an attacker can get your backups, they can have access to all your data without you ever knowing it.)
The final stage of incident response is the follow-up involved in reviewing the incident that has transpired and the action taken to handle it.
This should be done to make sure not only that it won't happen again, but also to see if the procedure can be improved. Total cost of the incident in terms of employee time spent, loss of critical data, legal costs, computer time, etc, should be evaluated. This information should be compiled into a document to be used to determine what the risks of loss in the future, similiar incidents will be.
It is also highly recommended that CERT be notified, and the proper documentation be completed, in order to prevent others from being afflicted by the same attack. CERT will be more than willing to help you with your attempt at finding the intruder.
You should report the attack to the admin contact at the site where the attacker attacked your system. You can look up this contact with "whois" or the internic database. You might send them an email with all applicable log entries and dates and times. If you spotted anything else distinctive about your intruder, you might mention that too. After sending the email, you should (if you are so inclined) follow up with a phone call. If that admin in turn spots your attacker, they might be able to talk to the admin of the site where they are coming from and so on.
Good crackers often use many intermediate systems. Some (or many) of which may not even know they have been compromised. Trying to track a cracker back to their home system can be difficult. Being polite to the admins you talk to can go a long way to getting help from them.
You should also notify any security organizations you are a part of (CERT or similar), as well as your Linux system vendor. If you decide to report the intrusion, which is strongly advised, you should be ready for the types of questions that will be asked. Disclosure of the information is not mandatory, and most documents allow you to specify which information can be disclosed and which cannot. To be prepared for the types of questions that will be asked, you should document the working condition of your systems, including host information, administrative contact for that network, and the type of incident (probe, scan, prank, scam, email spoofing or bombardment, sendmail attack, etc)
Incident response is still a relatively new subject, and has not been studied as extensively as other subjects, such as contingency planning and risk analysis. However, there is a great deal of resources available to help in such circumstances. Two organizations, CERT/CC and FIRST are well-equipted to help in such events.
You can find the appropriate documents for reporting security exploits near the end of this document.
There are a LOT of good sites out there for UNIX security in general and Linux security specifically. It's very important to subscribe to one (or more) of the security mailing lists and keep current on security fixes. Most of these lists are very low volume, and very informative.
There is an Appendix section in ``Building Internet Firewalls''
that discusses some of the more popular and useful security tools.
Have you gotten the hint yet that this is a book you really should
purchase? :)
COAST, the Computer Operations, Audit, and Security Technology project at Purdue University is the place to go for security tools. You can find these archives at http://www.cs.purdue.edu/coast/hotlist/ They typically are very well organized, and have a clear description of what the tool does, as well as a keyword search.
Security tools are typically categorized in several different categories. These include network and host scanners to tell you which services are available on your system and possibly any exploits associated with those services, authentication tools, analysis tools to analyize your machines and log files both before an after an attack, service filtering tools such as firewalls and service monitors, and general utilities.
Linux systems, and Linux vendors, realize the benefits of many of these programs, and as a result many of the preventitive security tools have already been incorported into your distribution. Don't use this as an excuse for not going through what is available, and making sure it is configured properly.
There are a number of different software packages available that do port and service based scanning of machines or networks. SATAN and ISS are two of the more well known ones. This software connects to the target machine (or all the target machines on a network) on all the ports it can, and tries to determine what service is running there. Based on this information, you could find out the machine is vulnerable to a specific exploit on that server.
If when you run these network scanning and auditing tools, you find egregious security exploits, you should rethink your approach. These tools are not a one-stop security solution, and don't assume that if they don't find a problem, it doesn't exist.
SATAN is a port scanner with a web interface. SATAN was written by Dan Farmer and Wietse Venema, and released in 1995. It was based on known vulnerabilities (mainly those from CERT Advisories), but hasn't really been updated since then by the original authors.
It can be configured to do light, medium, or strong checks on a machine or a network of machines. It has been known in the past to crash machines when doing a heavy scan. This isn't a bug in SATAN; rather, it's a poorly configured machine. It's a good idea to get SATAN and scan your machine or network, and fix the problems it finds. http://www.trouble.org/~zen/satan/satan.html
Perhaps not as well known, but nevertheless useful, is a package called SAINT, which is also a security analyzer. Quoting from the README:
SAINT is the Security Administrator's Integrated Network Tool. In its simplest mode, it gathers as much information about remote hosts and networks as possible by examining such network services as finger, NFS, NIS, ftp and tftp, rexd, statd, and other services. The information gathered includes the presence of various network information services as well as potential security flaws -- usually in the form of incorrectly setup or configured network services, well-known bugs in system or network utilities, or poor or ignorant policy decisions. It can then either report on this data or use a simple rule-based system to investigate any potential security problems. Users can then examine, query, and analyze the output with an HTML browser, such as Mosaic, Netscape, or Lynx. While the program is primarily geared towards analyzing the security implications of the results, a great deal of general network information can be gained when using the tool - network topology, network services running, types of hardware and software being used on the network, etc.
However, the real power of SAINT comes into play when used in exploratory mode. Based on the initial data collection and a user configurable ruleset, it will examine the avenues of trust and dependency and iterate further data collection runs over secondary hosts. This not only allows the user to analyze her or his own network or hosts, but also to examine the real implications inherent in network trust and services and help them make reasonably educated decisions about the security level of the systems involved.
You can find the latest version at http://www.wwdsi.com/saint/, although it seems to be a relatively new product, but developing rapidly. It claims to be a work derived from SATAN, and includes many enhancements.
The security research group Rhino9 have released their auditing tool There are also several tools available for Linux that allow you to:
The tool seems to be still a little immature, but variation is always a good idea.
Internet Security Systems has written two proactive security tools, both of which run on Linux. ISS has been a long-time supporter of Linux, and make some very useful tools.
The System Security Scanner allows the security professional to "proactively seeking internal system vulnerabilities. S3 is a comprehensive host-based security assessment and intrusion detection tool which i dentifies and reports exploitable system weaknesses. S3 assesses file permissions and ownerships, network services, account setups, program authenticities, operating system configurations and common user-related security weaknesses such as guessable passw ords to determine current security levels and to identify previous system compromises. With the majority of information security breaches perpetrated by insiders, this avenue of assessment is of vital importance in assuring the protection of an organization's information."
It is commercially supported, currently checks for 413 vulnerabilities, and available for Linux.
Abacus-Sentry is a commercial port scanner from http://www.psionic.com. Look at it's home page on the web for more information.
Fyodor <fyodor@dhp.com> wrote ``The Art of Port Scanning'' in Volume 7, Issue 51 of Phrack Magazine, in September 1997, which discusses the various types of port scanning that can be done, and a source code program at the bottom that can be used to find out what services a host is offering, using a variety of port scanning techniques. It is available at http://www.2600.com/phrack/p51/ or at Fyodor's site http://www.dhp.com/~fyodor/nmap/
There are some tools designed to alert you to probes by Satan and ISS and other scanning software, however, liberal use of TCP wrappers and making sure to look over your log files regularly, you should be able to notice such probes. Even on the lowest setting, Satan still leaves traces in the logs on a stock Red Hat system.
There are also ``stealth'' port scanners. A packet with the TCP ACK bit set (as is done with established connections) will likely get through a packet-filtering firewall. The returned RST packet from a port that had no established session can be taken as proof of life on that port. I don't think TCP wrappers will detect this.
You should read the Phrack magazine document listed in the previous section to understand the types of port scans that can be performed on your systems.
A properly configured implementation of TCP Wrappers can do a great deal towards catching an intrusion attempt, and even warn the administrator of the break-in. See the Host Security section for specific examples of TCP Wrappers usage.
Gabriel, a tool specially designed to detect SATAN scans and attacks, but can also detect other types of scans, probes and system attacks, can be found at COAST.
Boston Office: (617) 223-6056
Depending on the City which the bureau is located, such a crime as email threats will be handled by either the Violent Crime Unit, or NCCS.
There is a vendor FAQ available at http://www.iss.net/vd/vendor.html where you can find general vendor information. The Linux-specific contacts are as follows:
These are the classic security-based mailing lists available to the general public. You've probably seen the addresses for these lists a thousand times by now, but here they are again, all in one place.
Subscription requests for most lists is performed by sending ``subscribe listname'' in the body of the message. Be sure to keep your subscription information, so you know the proper way to unsubscribe.
There are a number of good security books out there. This section lists a few of them. In addition to the security specify books, security is covered in a number of other books on system administration. There really is an incredible amount of information on security available on the Internet; it's just a matter of finding it.
D. Brent Chapman & Elizabeth D. Zwicky 1st Edition September 1995 ISBN: 1-56592-124-0
2nd Edition By Simson Garfinkel & Gene Spafford 2nd Edition April 1996 ISBN: 1-56592-148-8
Deborah Russell & G.T. Gangemi, Sr. 1st Edition July 1991 ISBN: 0-937175-71-4
Olaf Kirch 1st Edition January 1995 ISBN: 1-56592-087-2
Simson Garfinkel 1st Edition December 1994 ISBN: 1-56592-098-8
By David Icove, Karl Seger & William VonStorch (Consulting Editor Eugene H. Spafford)1st Edition August 1995 ISBN: 1-56592-086-4
Listed here are a few of the most common terms used most frequently, yet may not be familiar to some users. See the NET-3-HOWTO for further networking information, and the excellent 3Com Network Glossary for a great online glossary, available at http://www.3com.com/nsc/glossary/index.htm
There is also a security-oriented glossary available at http://www.securityinfo.com/glossary.html that will be useful.
You can find more information on both setuid and
setgid in the File System Security section of this
document.
An Internet Firewall is most often installed at the point where your protected internal network connects to the Internet.
All traffic coming from the Internet or going out from your internal network passes through the firewall. Because it does, the firewall has the opportunity to make sure that this traffic is permitted to pass through, as defined by the security policy at your site.''
For you to determine whether you think Linux is a secure operating system, there are a few pieces of information you should be aware of before making your decision:
Is it more secure to compile driver support directly into the kernel, instead of making it a module?
Answer: Some people think it is better to disable the ability to load device drivers using modules, because an intruder could load a trojan module or himself load a module that could affect system security.
However, in order to load modules, you must be root. The module object files are also only writable by root. This means the intruder would need root access to insert a module. If the intruder gains root access, there are more serious things to worry about than whether he will load a module.
Modules are for dynamically loading support for a particular device that may be infrequently used. On server machines, or firewalls for instance, this is very unlikely to happen. For this reason, it would make more sense to compile support directly into the kernel for machines acting as a server. Modules are also slower than support compiled directly in the kernel.
Answer: Well, you've taken the first step, and admitted that it has been a cause of exploit in the past. There have been several papers written on it's insecurity. Their new version, FrontPage 98 apparently hasn't gotten much better. Read this article, for an interesting overview of the issues at hand http://www.mr.net/~fritchie/frontpage.html
Also, the Microsoft FrontPage Security Hell is available here http://www.worldgate.com/~marcs/fp/
Instructions for installing and configuring, as well as building awareness, is available at the FrontPage Awareness Site available at http://frontpage.netnation.com/
Answer: Well, the obvious answer is to read and follow the procedures outlined in this document.
Assuming you have done that, and you are not currently aware of one of your machines already being exploited, and perhaps less obviously, download some of the exploits from http://www.rootshell.com and see if they work on your machine.
Answer: This information is covered in the Firewall-HOWTO, as well as in the Firewalls and Border Patrol section of this document. You should keep in mind that the ipfwadm(8) command is specific to the 2.0 release of the kernel. Version 2.2 will feature a much improved firewall, called IP Chains. You can find more information on IP Chains in the Firewalls section of this document.
Answer: The best thing you can do here is to check your Linux vendor's errata for any preconfigured packages in their updates archive for your current distribution.
You should also already be subscribed to one of the informational security mailing lists, or at least the announce list from your vendor, describing the procedure for finding the proper updates.
Answer: See the section on root security. This is done intentionally to prevent remote users from attempting to connect via telnet to your machine as root, which is a serious security vulnerability. Don't forget, potential intruders have time on their side, and can run automated programs to find your password.
How do I enable shadow passwords on my Red Hat 4.2 or 5.x system?
Answer: Shadow passwords is a mechanism for storing your password in a
file other than the normal /etc/passwd file. This has
several advantages. The first one is that the shadow file,
/etc/shadow, is only readable by root, unlike
/etc/passwd, which must remain readable by everyone. The
other advantage is that as the administrator, you can enable or
disable accounts without everyone knowing the status of other users
accounts.
The /etc/passwd file is then used to store user and group
names, used by programs like /bin/ls to map the user ID to
the proper username in a directory listing.
The /etc/shadow file then only contains the username and his/her
password, and perhaps accounting information, like when the account
expires, etc.
To enable shadow passwords, run /usr/bin/pwconv as root, and
/etc/shadow should now exist, and be used by applications.
Since you are using RH 4.2 or above, the PAM modules will
automatically adapt to the change from using normal
/etc/passwd to shadow passwords without any other change.
Since you are interested in securing your passwords, perhaps you would also be interested in generating good passwords to begin with. For this you can use the pam_cracklib module, which is part of PAM. It runs your password against the Crack libraries to help you decide if it is too easily guessable by password cracking programs.
Answer:
1.Get the latest version of SSLeay from ftp://ftp.psy.uq.oz.au/pub/Crypto/SSL
2.Build and test and install it!
3.Get the latest version of the Apache source
4.Get Apache SSLeay extensions from ftp://ftp.ox.ac.uk/pub/crypto/SSL/apache_1.2.5+ssl_1.13.tar.gz
5. Unpack it in the apache-1.2.5 source directory and patch Apache as per the README.
6.Configure and build it.
You might also try http://www.replay.com which has many pre-built packages, and is located outside of the United States.
Answer: The Red Hat distribution, especially RH5.0, contains a great number of tools to change the properties of user accounts.
pwconv(8) and unpwconv(8) programs can be
used to convert back and forth between shadow and non-shadowed
passwords.
pwck(1) and grpck(1) programs can be used
to verify proper organization of the passwd and group files.
useradd(8), usermod(8), and
userdel(8) can be used to add, delete and modify user
accounts. The programs groupadd, groupmod, and groupdel will do the
same for groups.
gpasswd(1)./etc/shadow for password information, otherwise it won't.
See the respective man pages for further information.
Answer: I bet you didn't know about http://www.apacheweek.org did you?
You can find information on User Authentication at http://www.apacheweek.com/features/userauth as well as other web server security tips from http://www.apache.org/docs/misc/security_tips.html
Any shell script set to run as root can gain unauthorized root access to ordinary users. It is therefore disabled in the kernel from operating. The details about how one can break a setuid shell script are posted regularly on Usenet. Set-User-ID programs are one of the most common methods of intrusion, especially by means of buffer overflow.
See the UNIX FAQ for more information on how this actually works.
By subscribing to the security alert mailing lists, and keeping current, you can do a lot towards securing your machine. If you pay attention to your log files and run something like tripwire regularly, you can do even more.
A reasonable level of computer security is not difficult to maintain on a home machine. More effort is required on business machines, but Linux can indeed be a secure platform. Due to the nature of Linux development, security fixes often come out much faster than they do on commercial operating systems, making Linux an ideal platform when security is a requirement.
It is unfortunate that this document does not discuss some other issues, such as the legal ones. While this certainly affects an administrator, it does not uniquely affect a Linux system administrator. The legal issues are real ones. Luckily, there is an incredible amount of information on this topic available elsewhere already.
Some things you should always be sure to do when taking on a security project:
Keeping up-to-date with the flood of security topics can be an overwhelming task. Take a piece at a time, and prioritize what needs to be done. Choosing the obvious holes to fix first is a good start.
Remember, just because you have all the latest software updates installed, does not mean your machines are secure. There will always be new software exploits, as well as uneducated users who choose poor passwords. Continual inspection and attentiveness is required.
Special thanks to Antonomasia <ant@notatla.demon.co.uk> for repeated reviewing of this document, as well as a great source of information for bouncing off of ideas, general improvements, and suggestions.
I also appreciate all the work the developers have put into their security area of expertise, and providing us with an outstanding alternative to the expensive, proprietary solutions we would otherwise have to endure.