Digital Webbing Pipeline C&R




CURRENT ISSUE



PREVIOUS ISSUES



SUBSCRIBE



LINKS








CDnow





In Association with 
Amazon.com







Open Directory Project

PIPELINE COMMENTARY AND REVIEW #57
05 July 1998
by Augie De Blieck Jr.
http://www.nic.com/~augie/pipeline

Thanks to Tony Isabella and his wonderful daily column 

     http://www.wfcomics.com/tony 

I became the proud winner of a half-dozen Archie Comics.

First, a little background: As a wee lad, I can remember watching the 
Archie cartoon of the mid-1980s or so.  That's really been my only 
exposure to the characters of Riverdale. 

I went into this little experiment knowing the basics of the characters 
but not much more.  I went in knowing little to nothing about the 
creative teams involved.  (Is there one master of the form and creator 
of all, such as Carl Barks is for the Duck books?  Is there one title 
that's more successful than the others?  Are the digests nothing more 
than reformatted stories from the regular-sized editions?)

Quite honestly, I still don't know the answer to any of those questions.  
If anyone knows where I might find an Archie FAQ or something, I'd sure 
appreciate it.  I'm curious.

The digests seem to be comprised more of older material and reprints.  
The regular format books seem to contain more new material.

There are several interesting things I took away from these comics.

The first is that they do reflect the teenagers of the day.  This can be 
wonderfully nostalgiac and cute, such as in the strips I pegged for 
being done in the 1980s - decade of my childhood and fondest memories.  
At other times, it can be annoying.  If I hear Veronica or Betty say 
"You go, girl" again I may scream.  (Or were they just referring to 
each other as "girlfriend"?  Either way I may scream.)  So it does form 
a sort of history of American styles and pop culture.  If and when they 
release the hardcover edition of ARCHIE COMICS IN THE 1980s, as they 
have done now for the previous 3 decades' worth of material, I'll be in 
line to buy my copy.  (I think they're hardcover.  I'm going by 
solicitations I remember seeing in PREVIEWS.)

Secondly, they're easy to read.  This isn't a put-down.  Comics come in 
all shapes and sized.  When I pick up an Alan Moore title, for example, 
I know to set some time aside and pick a quiet place to read the book.  
I read these Archie comics while downloading files, waiting during 
commercial breaks in TV shows, and with the music on in the background.  
They're not over-written.  They don't include tons of narration or 
dialogue or expository material.  They're simple without being 
simplistic.  Straight-forward stuff.  I liked it.

Third, they're fun to read.  In many cases, these stories are things 
that do happen to teenagers and that teenagers do go through, to one 
extent or another.  While I'm happy to forget much of my teenage 
life in favor of the college years, it's still nice to relive some 
memories.  Often they're cartoony and breezy and wistful.  So what?

The stories are usually short.  With only a couple of exceptions, most 
were done in four or five pages.  Many were only a page or two.  You can 
cram a lot of stories in a comic that way and make a reader feel like 
they got their money's worth.

Characters are cross-pollinated.  Josie and the Pussycats will appear in 
a BETTY AND VERONICA title, for example, and Sabrina will show up in a 
digest starring Archie.  These are just small tastes to introduce 
characters otherwise left alone by the reader.  It's a nice short 
introduction to what else the line has to offer while stil being 
entertaining.

In many ways, these books are similar to the Duck books.  Short stories.  
Done well.  Collected together, both old and new.  Many titles featuring 
the same characters, with just slightly different emphases depending on 
what the title's name is. 

These books are also perfect for kids.  Heck, they're geared for them.  
The letters columns are full of advice and hints for kids.  The very 
form of the comic allows for placement at the checkout stand at the 
foodstore, allowing the kids to pester Mom for a comic book for behaving 
well while she shopped for the past hour and a half...  (OK, maybe I'm 
projecting now.)

The females are beautiful and as sexy as can be in comics without being 
overt or perverted.  There is no nippleage here.  There are no 
gratuitous T&A shots, nor any conveniently-ripped clothing...  

They're a lot of fun.  Yes, they suffer from some things.  For one, 
Archie Comics adhere strongly to the illusion of change.  There is no 
actual change.  Clothing styles change, but not the characters.  You can 
bring in a little sister for Jughead or throw a monkey wrench in the 
works with Cheryl Blossom, but the same old, same old carries on.  A 
little stability is fine, I imagine.

Do I, as a collector, want to carry on buying these books?  I don't 
know.  Despite all my raves here, I'm not sure if they're necessarily my 
thing.  Maybe once in a while I'll take a look in.  I do know that there 
is a lot of fun to be had.  But for now I'll stick with my other regular 
reads, thanks.

-Augie, too tired to proofread - my apologies in advance


[Main] [VR.5 FAQ] [VR.5 Episode Guide] [TWO FAQ] [Fan-Fiction]

(C) 1999 Augie De Blieck Jr., who actually encourages you to link in to this site!